The point of discussion of this paper is to have a detailed overview of blasphemy laws under the “Pakistan Penal Code”. This paper will begin by discussing what blasphemy is, then it will discuss the blasphemy laws in Pakistan with the historical background. It will explain the landmark blasphemy case: Mst. Asia Bibi v The State. The critical review of the Asia Bibi Case will be given in this paper at hand. This paper will briefly discuss the flaws in section 295C and how it is causing injustices in society and further discusses how it is misused against minorities and discriminate against people on the basis of their religion. Furthermore, it will be discussed how blasphemy laws are causing serious threats to society perhaps destroying the religious harmony in the society. In addition to that this paper will also discuss these laws in the light of Islam. In the end, it’ll give some recommendations to make this law compatible with society. The whole paper is supported by case laws.
Table of Contents
Part I: INTRODUCTION
WHAT IS BLASPHEMY?
BLASPHEMY LAWS
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW
SECTION 295-B & 295-C
Part II: CASE STUDY
Mst. Asia Bibi v The State
FACTS AND JUDGMENT
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE
VIOLATION OF RIGHTS
How Blasphemy Laws Cause Infringement Of Fundamental Rights
Asiya Bibi Case
Wajih-ul-Hassan v. The State
Part III: FLAWS IN LAW
LACK OF INTENT
UNJUSTIFIABLE PUNISHMENT: A COMPARISON WITH OTHER MUSLIM COUNTRIES
Part IV: MISUSE OF BLASPHEMY LAWS
i. Used for suppressing minorities
ii. Extra judicial killings
iii. Discrimination on the basis of religion
Part V: ISLAMIC CRITIQUE
Part VI: RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCLUSION
Objectives and Topics
This paper examines the evolution, implementation, and sociopolitical consequences of blasphemy laws in Pakistan, with a specific focus on the systemic flaws and widespread misuse of Section 295-C. The research seeks to address how these laws undermine fundamental human rights, fuel sectarian violence, and deviate from both constitutional guarantees and core Islamic principles of justice.
- The historical development and legislative origin of blasphemy laws in Pakistan.
- Critical analysis of legal proceedings in high-profile cases, such as Mst. Asia Bibi v The State.
- Assessment of the systemic lack of criminal intent (mens rea) in judicial applications.
- The role of blasphemy laws in suppressing religious minorities and dissent.
- The contradictions between current penal practices and Islamic jurisprudence regarding tolerance and due process.
Excerpt from the Book
LACK OF INTENT
A very important flaw in the drafting of this provision is that it does not take into account of intention of an offender. The word intentionally/willfully/deliberately is missing from this provision which make its problematic. Without the determination of mens rea state is prosecuting a person and giving him a death sentence while he or she does not have any intention to commit crime. While unintentional and intentional offences are treated in the same way by giving the same punishment for both offences. The example of Younus Sheikh vs. State gives the clear picture of this procedural flaw. Mohammed Younus Shaikh was a medical doctor, human rights activist and freethinker, and he was accused of blasphemy and he was charged by the court ordered to pay a fine of 100,000 rupees, and sentenced him to death by hanging and later acquitted.
Summary of Chapters
Part I: INTRODUCTION: Outlines the definition of blasphemy and the historical transition of blasphemy laws from the British colonial era to the amendments introduced under General Zia ul Haq.
Part II: CASE STUDY: Examines the legal proceedings and judicial outcomes in the case of Mst. Asia Bibi, highlighting the trial and subsequent acquittal by the Supreme Court.
VIOLATION OF RIGHTS: Discusses how the current application of blasphemy laws infringes upon the right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence, citing multiple legal cases.
Part III: FLAWS IN LAW: Critiques the legal drafting of Section 295-C and provides a comparative perspective on punishments in other Muslim-majority nations.
Part IV: MISUSE OF BLASPHEMY LAWS: Details how the laws are systematically used to suppress minorities, facilitate extrajudicial killings, and foster religious discrimination.
Part V: ISLAMIC CRITIQUE: Presents an analysis of blasphemy laws through the lens of Sharia, arguing that they contradict the Prophet’s conduct and Islamic teachings of forgiveness.
Part VI: RECOMMENDATIONS: Proposes legislative reforms, specifically the introduction of intent (mens rea) as a requirement and the reduction of mandatory death sentences.
CONCLUSION: Summarizes that the current state of blasphemy laws is inconsistent with both law and religion, calling for urgent review.
Keywords
Blasphemy, Pakistan Penal Code, Section 295-C, Human Rights, Religious Minorities, Mens Rea, Due Process, Judiciary, Asia Bibi, Religious Discrimination, Islamic Jurisprudence, Extrajudicial Killings, Legal Reform, Freedom of Speech, Sectarian Violence
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this research?
The work primarily focuses on the legislative history, judicial application, and the resulting human rights concerns surrounding Pakistan's blasphemy laws.
What are the central themes discussed in the text?
Key themes include legal misuse, the violation of fundamental rights, the lack of requirement for criminal intent, and the socioeconomic impact on religious minorities.
What is the core research question or objective?
The main objective is to identify why these laws are frequently misused and to propose legal reforms that align the statutes with constitutional rights and Islamic principles of justice.
Which scientific or analytical methods are applied?
The paper utilizes a legal-analytical method, examining case law, judicial judgments, constitutional articles, and comparative legal frameworks from other Muslim countries.
What topics are covered in the main body of the text?
The body covers historical overviews, detailed case studies, analysis of legal drafting flaws, the comparison of penal codes, and the critique of social outcomes like extrajudicial killings.
Which keywords best characterize this work?
Keywords include Blasphemy, Pakistan Penal Code, Human Rights, Mens Rea, Judicial Misuse, and Religious Minorities.
How does the author characterize the role of the Federal Shariat Court?
The author discusses the court's historical rulings on the interpretation of "intent" versus "reckless wrong" and how these interpretations have evolved or been challenged over time.
What is the significance of the Asia Bibi case in this paper?
The Asia Bibi case serves as a primary example of how long pre-trial detention and the absence of proof beyond a reasonable doubt lead to significant violations of human rights and personal liberty.
What does the paper suggest regarding the "lack of intent" flaw?
It argues that the omission of terms like "maliciously" or "intentionally" from the penal code allows for the prosecution of individuals, including the mentally deranged, without established criminal intent.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Fatima Tariq (Autor:in), 2019, Blasphemy laws in Pakistan, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/512540
