In this paper, the author addresses the investigation of social varieties of language such as sociolects. This work will concentrate on vernacular, slang, argot, domain, register and jargon of the English language. For this purpose the author analyses definitions, terms and examples.
The way we speak is an indicator of our social background as there are many features which can be used as clues. Sociolect is when a person speaks in accordance with the social group. If we know the history of different varieties of a language we can learn about the region, history and people. The speech of the dominant class is referred as the standard speech whereas the speech of the minority groups is referred as dialects. The main aim of this study is to explore the different concepts and differentiate them one by one.
Table of Contents
1 ABSTRACT
2 Introduction
3 Social Dialect or Sociolect
3.1 Vernacular
3.2 Slang
3.3 Jargon
3.4 Register
3.5 Discourse Domain
3.6 Argot
4 Conclusion
Objectives and Research Themes
The primary objective of this research is to investigate social varieties of language, specifically sociolects, and to provide a clear differentiation between key concepts such as vernacular, slang, jargon, register, discourse domain, and argot. By analyzing these linguistic forms, the study aims to illustrate how language functions as an indicator of social background and group identity.
- Exploration of the relationship between social class and linguistic variation.
- Definition and analysis of vernacular, slang, jargon, register, discourse domain, and argot.
- Differentiation between social dialects and regional dialects.
- Investigation of how situational context and professional affiliation influence language use.
Excerpt from the Book
3.3 Jargon
Jargon is language that is used by a particular group or profession. Jargon can be used to describe correctly technical language in a positive way as well as describes language which is obscure, technical in a negative way. Jargon has its own vocabulary and it is widely used in an area of study, a specific career which share the same profession. We will give some examples of jargon below:
“A common dictum in allergy practice is that the patient’s medical history is the primary diagnostic test. Laboratory studies, including skin and in vitro tests for specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies, have relevance only when correlated with the patient’s medical history. Furthermore, treatment should always be directed toward current symptomatology and not merely toward the results of specific allergy tests.”
In the sentences above we can see that we have a medical jargon, whereas the meaning of dictum in plain English is a truth that is accepted in general, the laboratory is the lab, whereas symptomatology is simply a patient’s set of symptoms.
“This man was an involuntarily un-domiciled.”, is an unwanted, unnecessary jargon, because it has a negative meaning. Here the involuntarily un-domiciled allows a person to avoid saying the less attractive phrase “Homeless”. Jargon has both positive and negative sides.
Summary of Chapters
1 ABSTRACT: Provides an overview of the research focus on social varieties of language and the intent to differentiate between various sociolect concepts.
2 Introduction: Establishes the foundational definitions of dialects and sociolects while outlining the scope of the study.
3 Social Dialect or Sociolect: Examines the sociolinguistic connection between language and society, detailing specific forms of language variation.
3.1 Vernacular: Explains the uncodified, everyday language used informally by groups sharing common professional or regional backgrounds.
3.2 Slang: Describes informal, nonstandard language often used by specific sub-cultures to foster a sense of belonging and uniqueness.
3.3 Jargon: Analyzes the specialized vocabulary of professions or fields of study and its role in technical communication.
3.4 Register: Discusses how language variety changes according to the communication setting and context.
3.5 Discourse Domain: Explores the cognitive and social construction of language based on environmental signals and situational context.
3.6 Argot: Investigates the specialized, often secret vocabulary used by closed social groups to maintain group boundaries.
4 Conclusion: Summarizes the importance of understanding these sociolects for appropriate social and professional communication.
Keywords
Sociolect, Vernacular, Slang, Jargon, Register, Discourse Domain, Argot, Sociolinguistics, Social Dialect, Language Variation, Social Identity, Communication Setting, Linguistic Variable, Social Status, Professional Language
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this research paper?
The paper focuses on the investigation of social varieties of language, known as sociolects, and explores how different social groups and professions utilize specific linguistic forms.
What are the central themes discussed in this work?
The central themes include the definitions and distinctions between vernacular, slang, jargon, register, discourse domain, and argot within the context of sociolinguistics.
What is the main goal or research question of the study?
The main goal is to explore these linguistic concepts and differentiate them one by one to better understand how language usage indicates social background and status.
Which scientific method is utilized in this paper?
The paper employs a descriptive and analytical approach based on sociolinguistic theory, definitions, and practical examples to differentiate language varieties.
What is covered in the main body of the work?
The main body provides detailed definitions, characteristics, and examples for each category of sociolect, comparing them to standard language usage.
Which keywords characterize this work?
Key terms include sociolect, vernacular, slang, jargon, register, discourse domain, argot, and social identity.
How does the author define the relationship between jargon and "doublespeak"?
The author identifies "doublespeak" as a form of jargon used to soften harsh realities, such as using "collateral damage" to describe accidental civilian casualties.
What is the distinction made between a "vernacular" and "formal language"?
Vernacular is described as informal, everyday language used within groups, whereas formal language is associated with institutional writing, professional settings, and academic purposes.
- Quote paper
- Denis Kastrati (Author), 2017, Sociolects. Language Variations in Sociolinguistics, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/585246
