Grin logo
de en es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › Law - Media, Multimedia Law, Copyright

Discussion: With Reference to the Copyright Laws of at least two Countries evaluate the Extent to which Changes to the Law have taken Place as a Result of technological Change

Title: Discussion: With Reference to the Copyright Laws of at least two Countries evaluate the Extent to which Changes to the Law have taken Place as a Result of technological Change

Seminar Paper , 2004 , 25 Pages , Grade: First, distinction

Autor:in: Sandra Vivian Wagner (Author)

Law - Media, Multimedia Law, Copyright
Excerpt & Details   Look inside the ebook
Summary Excerpt Details

This paper tries to examine the impact of technological change and thus asks, in how far copyright laws have developed as a direct answer to technological inventions and which other factors supported or delayed its development. After a short presentation of the concept of copyright, it is argued that worldwide technological change was and still is one of the most important factors influencing the development of copyright laws. However, it is also shown that this impact has not always been the same. This paper identifies four distinguishable ‘epochs’ which reflect different impacts of technology on the development of copyright law and it can be seen that basically the following ‘epochs’ can be found in various jurisdictions:


1. from 1445-1500 technological change was the initial drive for copyright law;
2. from 1500-1700 the stabilisation of political power through censorship determined copyright law;
3. from 1700-1886 technological progress is again in the centre of copyright developments and
4. from 1886-today technological progress is still highly influential, but the aim of international uniformity and economic considerations are of equally strong influence.


Having a closer look on these four ‘epochs’ , it is also shown that they cannot be seen as fixed, as not all countries fit nicely into this scheme.

Excerpt


Table of Contents

I. INTRODUCTION

II. ELABORATION

1. The Concept of Copyright

2. A Journey through Copyright History

2.1 (a) ‘1st Epoch’: 1445-1500

2.2 (b) ‘2nd Epoch’: 1500-1700

2.3 (c) ‘3rd Epoch’: 1700-1886

2.3.1 (1) First Modern Copyright Laws

2.3.2 (2) Photography

2.3.3 (3) Outcome

2.4 (d) ‘4th Epoch’: 1886-today

2.4.1 (1) National Uniformity

2.4.2 (2) International Uniformity

2.4.3 (3) Technological Progress

2.4.3.1 (i) Radio

2.4.3.2 (ii) Sound Recordings and Film

2.4.3.3 (iii) Xerography

2.4.3.4 (iv) Computers, Internet and Digitalisation

2.4.4 (4) Censorship

2.4.5 (5) Conclusion

III. CONCLUSION

Objectives and Research Focus

This paper examines the extent to which copyright laws have evolved as a direct response to technological advancements, versus other influential factors such as political power, economic interests, and the need for international legal harmonization. It investigates whether technological change acts as the primary motor for legal development or merely as an ignition for a process driven by multiple economic and social engines.

  • Analysis of the historical progression of copyright laws across four distinct "epochs."
  • Comparison of copyright developments in the UK and the US, with comparative excursions into other jurisdictions.
  • Evaluation of the role of economic pressure groups and powerful guilds in shaping copyright legislation.
  • Investigation into the historical use of copyright law as an instrument for political censorship and power stabilization.
  • Assessment of the challenges posed by modern digital technologies, including the internet, MP3s, and digital piracy.

Excerpt from the Book

(c) ‘3rd Epoch’: 1700-1886

In the ‘3rd epoch’ copyright law was influenced by multiple factors.

(1) First Modern Copyright Laws The 18th century was characterised by the first modern copyrights laws being enacted all over Europe and in the US. In the UK the Statute of Anne of 1709 revolutionised two important aspects of copyright law: it recognised the author as the owner of copyright protection and introduced the principle of limited protection for published works.

Similarly, first modern copyright acts were enacted in Spain in 1762, in France by Decrees of 1791 and 1793 and in Germany by the Prussian Code of 1794 although the rights were here still with the publishers and not with the authors of the work.

Also in the US a first Copyright Act was enacted in 1790 based on the 1st Article, Section 8 of the US Constitution 1787 which widely mirrored the UK Statute of Anne, but which protected maps, charts and books alone. Before this uniform approach twelve of the thirteen States had had their own differing copyright laws.

These developments cannot only be seen as products of technological change; it must rather be kept in mind that the 18th century was also faced with the formation of powerful guilds. This means printers and publishers had organised themselves and formed an economically and politically important pressure group which cannot be denied influence. Furthermore, especially in the US but also in Europe the desire of a uniform copyright act can additionally be assumed.

Summary of Chapters

I. INTRODUCTION: Outlines the historical context of copyright, posits that technological change is a major driver of legal evolution, and introduces the paper’s four-epoch framework.

II. ELABORATION: Provides an in-depth historical analysis of how copyright concepts have shifted from technological responses to instruments of political and economic control.

III. CONCLUSION: Synthesizes the findings, confirming that while technology acts as an ignition for legal updates, modern copyright is a complex system driven by various economic, international, and political forces.

Keywords

Copyright Law, Technological Change, Intellectual Property, Digitalisation, Statute of Anne, Berne Convention, Censorship, Piracy, International Uniformity, Economic Interests, Internet, Sound Recordings, Software Protection, Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), Legal History.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core focus of this research paper?

The paper explores the relationship between technological progress and the development of copyright laws in the UK and the US, questioning if technology is the sole driver of legal change.

What are the primary thematic areas covered?

The study covers the history of copyright, the impact of various technologies (printing, photography, radio, internet), political censorship, and international harmonization.

What is the main research question of the work?

The central question is to what extent copyright laws have developed as a direct reaction to technological inventions and which other factors, such as economic or political agendas, have supported or hindered this development.

Which scientific methodology is employed?

The author uses a historical-comparative method, categorizing the evolution of copyright into four distinct "epochs" and analyzing specific statutes and international treaties within these periods.

What topics are discussed in the main section?

The main section details the "epochs" of copyright development, starting from the printing press in the 15th century through to modern digital challenges like file-sharing and ISP liability in the 21st century.

Which keywords best characterize this work?

Key terms include copyright law, technological change, digitalization, censorship, international uniformity, and intellectual property.

How did censorship in the 16th and 17th centuries shape copyright law?

Copyright was utilized as a tool by national authorities and churches to control the dissemination of information and stabilize political power, rather than simply as a response to technical printing capabilities.

Why was the Universal Copyright Convention (UCC) significant?

It acted as a strategic mechanism to bind the US and other countries into an international framework, serving economic interests through reciprocity rather than being a direct reaction to new technology.

What conclusion does the author draw regarding technology as a "motor" for copyright law?

The author concludes that while technology acts as an "ignition," contemporary copyright law is a vehicle driven by multiple engines, including political power, economic lobbying, and global market integration.

Excerpt out of 25 pages  - scroll top

Details

Title
Discussion: With Reference to the Copyright Laws of at least two Countries evaluate the Extent to which Changes to the Law have taken Place as a Result of technological Change
College
University of Wales, Aberystwyth  (Law Faculty)
Course
Seminar: International Copyright Law
Grade
First, distinction
Author
Sandra Vivian Wagner (Author)
Publication Year
2004
Pages
25
Catalog Number
V61017
ISBN (eBook)
9783638545631
ISBN (Book)
9783638667777
Language
English
Tags
Discussion With Reference Copyright Laws Countries Extent Changes Place Result Change Seminar International Copyright
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Sandra Vivian Wagner (Author), 2004, Discussion: With Reference to the Copyright Laws of at least two Countries evaluate the Extent to which Changes to the Law have taken Place as a Result of technological Change, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/61017
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  25  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint