The process of European integration makes significant and visibly progress. Only few months ago a considerable number of European citizen decided enthusiastically to adapt the new € currency, while the procedure and negotiation towards the eastward enlargement of the Community produces predominantly positive news. At latest with the Council Meeting of Laeken it had been concluded that a major step of the enlargement – and thus an unprecedented step in Europe’s history – might be accomplished in 2004 [1]. Nonetheless, the events of two recent wars on the Balkans (Bosnia and Kosovo) and the consciousness of Europe’s inability to cope with these local conflicts prevails still in the collective memory of most of European political and military leaders. After the end of the Cold War the today’s security scenario is lacking the – to certain extent healthy – superpower polarity of the good old days that often served to impose tense order in a confrontational world. Intra-failed-state and regional conflicts are now joining with local instability and insurgencies, which may define the most likely forms of upcoming armed conflicts in Europe or its near periphery[2].
Thus, aim of this paper shall be to elaborate a feasible and predictable scenario of European future security policy and its accompanying means. To the purpose of this discussion it deems necessary first to identify where Europe is, or where it ends, and what should be considered indispensable for a European security model. Correspondingly, there are already a number of international organizations in existence, which solely may already provide sufficient security to what is considered of Europe’s interest. Part of this paper shall be the evaluation if these existing institutions. This should allow for some recommendations, which ought to be the last part of this discussion.
[...]
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Defining Europe and Europe’s interests
2.1 Europe’s interests
2.2 The Periphery
2.3 United States and Europe’s security
2.4 Europe’s relationship to Russia
3. Security Architecture of Europe
3.1 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
3.1.1 The objectives and legal basis of the Alliance
3.1.2 The evolution of the Atlantic Alliance
3.2 Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)
3.3 United Nations (UN)
3.4 Council of Europe (CoE)
3.5 European Union as an emerging player
3.5.1 Bilateral Arrangements
3.5.2 ESDP and EU Military Structure
4. A Co-operative System of European Security
5. Conclusion and Outlook
Research Objectives and Themes
This paper examines the feasibility and predictability of future European security policy in the post-Cold War era, evaluating existing institutional frameworks to propose a coherent security model. It addresses the central research question of how Europe can maintain stability and peace amidst regional conflicts and shifting global power dynamics.
- The evaluation of institutional roles, specifically NATO, the OSCE, the UN, and the Council of Europe.
- The emerging security role of the European Union through its Security and Defence Policy (ESDP).
- The impact of United States engagement and interests in European stability.
- The strategic relationship between Europe and Russia in an evolving geopolitical landscape.
- The necessity of a cooperative, multifaceted security approach (NATO plus EU).
Excerpt from the Book
3.1.1 The objectives and legal basis of the Alliance
The NATO handbook states: “The North Atlantic Alliance was founded on the basis of a Treaty between member states entered into freely … The Treaty upholds their individual rights as well as their international obligations in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. It commits each member country to sharing the risks and responsibilities as well as the benefits of collective security … Between the creation of the Alliance and the present day, half a century of history has taken place. For much of this time the central focus of NATO was providing for the immediate defence and security of its member countries. Today this remains its core task, but its immediate focus has undergone fundamental change”. This very fact surfaced during the last decade several times, beginning with the Gulf War, followed by the actions taken in Bosnian and Herzegovina and finally in Kosovo. However, after attempts of collective security like the League of Nations failed to guarantee the existence of save environment, NATO emerged as a so far successful regional arrangement, which – despite its economic, political and military resources – succeed the end of the Cold War.
Summary of Chapters
1. Introduction: Introduces the evolving European security landscape post-Cold War and defines the objective of elaborating a feasible security model.
2. Defining Europe and Europe’s interests: Analyzes the conceptual and geographical boundaries of Europe and the strategic interests of the EU, the US, and Russia.
3. Security Architecture of Europe: Provides an in-depth evaluation of key institutions including NATO, OSCE, UN, Council of Europe, and the EU's emerging military structures.
4. A Co-operative System of European Security: Synthesizes the institutional findings into a potential cooperative security framework.
5. Conclusion and Outlook: Summarizes the findings and posits the necessity of a coordinated "NATO plus EU" approach for future stability.
Keywords
European Security, NATO, European Union, ESDP, Collective Security, Conflict Management, Post-Cold War, Transatlantic Relations, Russia, Geopolitics, Defence Policy, Crisis Management, Institutional Cooperation, Stability, Multilateralism.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the fundamental focus of this research?
The research explores how the post-Cold War European security landscape can be stabilized through the analysis and integration of various existing international institutions and models.
What are the primary institutional pillars discussed?
The core institutions analyzed are NATO, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the United Nations (UN), the Council of Europe (CoE), and the European Union (EU).
What is the ultimate goal of the author?
The primary goal is to determine a feasible and predictable security model for Europe that addresses current threats and manages future regional crises effectively.
Which scientific method does the paper apply?
The paper utilizes a descriptive and evaluative method, synthesizing geopolitical theory, historical context, and current strategic doctrine to analyze the efficacy of international organizations.
What topics are covered in the main section?
The main section details the strategic interests of Europe, the role of the US in European security, Russia's geopolitical posture, and the structural developments within NATO and the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).
Which keywords characterize this publication?
Key themes include Collective Security, Transatlantic Relations, European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP), and institutional cooperation.
How does the author define the relationship between NATO and the EU?
The author argues that NATO remains the essential guarantor of collective defense, while the EU is developing a complementary capability for crisis management through its Petersberg tasks.
What role does the Kaliningrad region play in the security model?
Kaliningrad is identified as a critical future keystone for security discussions, as its specific socio-economic and political challenges will influence the rapprochement between Russia and the European Union.
- Quote paper
- Heiko Bubholz (Author), 2002, Co-operative System of European Security, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/6241
