Ho and Platt (1993:1) argue that Singaporean English is a particularly interesting
indigenized, or nativized, speech variety because it is so widely used and fills so many
functions. I can confirm Ho and Platt’s statement, since I was in Singapore in 2004. It was not
difficult to notice Singapore English as a speech variety. This sparked my interest in
participating in the proseminar ‘English in Singapore’ and consequently in researching into a
certain grammatical phenomenon in Singapore English, namely the passive voice.
In this term paper, a short analysis of the two passive structures specific to Colloquial
Singapore English (the so-called kena passive and the give passive) will be presented. Further
on, we the get passive will be examined. We will show that give- and kena-constructions are
derived from the languages of Chinese and Malay, respectively. The bigger part of this paper
will be to examine the overall frequencies thereof. Which of the two passive constructions
will be closer in structure to the standard form? A personal analysis will help us to answer this
question, always with the hidden desire to finally come up with a reasonable conclusion
towards the end of the paper. We will probably have a winner of the competing substrate form
and we will hopefully find out which passive construction is the most productive one in
Singapore English.
Moreover, we want to compare the frequency of the kena-passive with the getpassive’s
frequency in a corpus-based analysis. Admittedly, the corpus-based study will be
relatively restrictive and not quite large in size. In addition, the give-passive will be ignored
due to its rarity.
Further on, we want to compare passive voice in Singapore with the passive in
Standard English. To manage this, after having presented the development of Singapore, its
multilingualism and English as its most common language, we will define some basic terms,
which will be used in this term paper. After that, we will explain the corpus and the
methodology used. In the end, we will sum up the findings and we will discuss my own study.
Perhaps, there are possibilities how to do it better next time or there are other things that could
be done.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Introduction
- Passive Structures in Singapore English and its Frequencies
- Singapore
- A Short Overview of Passive Constructions used in Singapore
- The Kena Passive
- Malaysia and the Use of Kena
- The Give Passive
- Mandarin and the Use of Passive Voice
- The Get Passive
- The International Corpus of English - The Singapore Corpus
- Conclusion
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This term paper examines the usage of passive structures in Singapore English, specifically focusing on the 'kena passive' and 'give passive' constructions. The paper aims to analyze the origin and frequency of these structures, compare them to standard passive forms, and ultimately determine which passive construction is most prevalent in Singapore English.
- The origin and development of passive structures in Singapore English
- The influence of Malay and Chinese languages on the formation of the 'kena' and 'give' passives
- The frequency and productivity of passive constructions in Singapore English
- Comparison of Singaporean passive structures to standard passive forms in English
- The impact of multilingualism on the development of Singapore English
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
- Introduction: The paper introduces the concept of Singapore English as a nativized speech variety and explains the rationale for studying passive structures. It highlights the focus on the 'kena' and 'give' passives and outlines the objectives of the analysis.
- Singapore: This chapter provides historical and linguistic background information about Singapore, emphasizing the country's multilingualism and the role of English in its society. It discusses the prevalence of various languages, the development of English medium education, and the emergence of Colloquial Singapore English.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
The main focus of this paper is on passive structures, specifically the 'kena passive' and 'give passive' constructions in Singapore English. Other key concepts include multilingualism, language influence, frequency analysis, and the comparison between Singaporean English and standard English passive structures.
- Quote paper
- Dominik Lorenz (Author), 2006, Passive Structures in Singapore English, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/73033
