The current debate on globalization has raised an important question for economists: Is the world really becoming a ‘global village’ with a ‘weightless economy’? In accordance with Cairncross’s best-selling book The Death of Distance (2001) some economists have argued that falling transportation and communication costs are leaving ‘distance’ a negligible factor in the assessment of barriers to trade and integration of the world economies. Yet there is not enough funded evidence for this. Recent studies on the importance of education suggest that knowledge, as the ‘basic commodity’ of the 21st century and major source of future growth, makes industries and thus trade more independent of traditional physical fetters. On the contrary, it is not clear to what extent transportation costs have generally declined. Moreover it is uncertain whether the decline in shipping costs affects distant and proximate transport equally. An emerging literature is trying to give consistent explanations for the puzzling persistence of the distance effect on trade flows and economic development. In this essay we will discuss some of the evidence found so far, that distance is still ‘alive’.
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. DISTANCE IS STILL ‘ALIVE’: EVIDENCE FROM THREE EXAMPLES
2.1 THE PUZZLING PERSISTENCE OF THE DISTANCE EFFECT ON BILATERAL TRADE
2.2 THE DISTANCE DECAY IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE PATTERNS
2.3 THE CANADA – U.S. BORDER PUZZLE
3. IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Research Objectives and Themes
This essay investigates whether distance remains a significant factor in global trade despite the advancements of globalization and modern communication technologies. It evaluates empirical evidence to challenge the notion of a "weightless economy" and explores how geographical barriers and transportation costs continue to influence world economic development.
- The persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade flows.
- The role of geographical distance decay in international trade patterns.
- The impact of national borders on regional trade integration, specifically the Canada-U.S. case.
- Theoretical explanations for rising or persistent trade costs in an era of technological progress.
- The long-term implications of physical and "soft" distance factors for international and national economic development.
Excerpt from the Book
2.1 The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade
Distance effects have traditionally been estimated with gravity models. In their simplest form these models predict bilateral trade flows based on the economic size of and distance between two countries, and have been employed to measure a whole range of possible trade determinants such as the impact of linguistic similarity, colonial ties or currency unions.
Disdier & Head (2004) provide us with the “first large-scale, systematic examination of the magnitude of the distance effect”. In their meta-analysis, (a statistical analysis of existing empirical results), of a representative sample of gravity model literature concerned with the effects of transaction costs on international trade they test the sensitivity of distance to time period, choice of control variables and differences in estimation techniques.
Controlling for structural and method variables the authors find that the time trend of the distance effect is clearly positive and especially significant from the 1980s onwards. Indeed, the numbers in figure 3 suggest that distance barriers mattered more in the 1990s than in the period from 1870-1969. From the “single continent” and “developed”/“no developed countries” coefficients one can infer a high transport elasticity for land trade and poor infrastructure economies respectively. In addition, the exclusion of the control variables “adjacency” and “common language” accounts for a significant proportion of the omitted variable bias.
Summary of Chapters
1. INTRODUCTION: This chapter introduces the debate on globalization, questioning whether the world is becoming a "weightless economy" and setting the stage for analyzing the continued relevance of distance in trade.
2. DISTANCE IS STILL ‘ALIVE’: EVIDENCE FROM THREE EXAMPLES: This section presents three core empirical cases—bilateral trade persistence, distance decay in trade patterns, and the Canada-U.S. border puzzle—to demonstrate why geographical distance remains a critical economic factor.
3. IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: This chapter synthesizes the findings, arguing that geographical conditions significantly impact market access, industry agglomeration, and location decisions, while "soft" factors continue to influence global economic integration.
Keywords
Globalization, Distance Effect, Gravity Model, Bilateral Trade, Transaction Costs, Trade Barriers, Economic Integration, Border Puzzle, Transportation Costs, Core-Periphery Model, Infrastructure, Market Access, Geography of Trade.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this research paper?
The paper examines whether the importance of geographical distance is declining due to globalization and technological advancements, or if it remains a persistent factor in international economic systems.
What are the core themes addressed in the work?
The work focuses on the persistence of distance in trade, the role of transportation costs, the impact of national borders on trade flows, and the geographical determinants of industrial agglomeration and economic growth.
What is the central research question?
The central question is whether the "death of distance" is a reality or if there is evidence that distance still matters significantly for global economic development, despite the internet and lower communication costs.
Which scientific methods are employed?
The author conducts a literature review and synthesis of existing meta-analyses and empirical studies, specifically focusing on gravity models and their application to trade data.
What is the main topic of the central chapter?
The main chapter provides empirical evidence through three case studies: the persistence of distance effects on bilateral trade, trade pattern decay, and the Canada-U.S. border puzzle.
Which keywords best characterize the study?
Key terms include Globalization, Gravity Model, Transaction Costs, Trade Barriers, and Economic Integration.
How does the author explain the Canada-U.S. border puzzle?
The author attributes the puzzle initially to high land transportation costs and later discusses the refinement provided by Anderson & Van Wincoop, who corrected for multilateral resistance terms and inaccurate model applications.
What role do "soft" factors play in global integration?
The author argues that even if economic trade obstacles are removed, "soft" factors like inapt governance and cultural differences will continue to favor rich OECD countries and hinder the development of the poorer periphery.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Arturo Minet (Autor:in), 2007, We are living in an era of globalisation, yet there is evidence that distance still matters, and increasingly so, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/77371
