This is an investigation into the death penalty and how it is applied across political lines in America. With a focus on the differences in Democratic run states and Republican run states. The death penalty and its effects on a state’s murder rate have long been a point of controversy. It has been debated whether the death penalty is a deterrent to crime. There is an ongoing need to understand the deterrence effect of the death penalty, in order to understand how to properly lower the murder rates in a given area. Further, in order to understand if the death penalty is applied in a given state , it is important to look at the political orientation of a particular state. Political orientation can have a strong affect on the punishment type chosen by a particular state.
This study seeks to clarify the debate by looking at the statistical facts, and formulating hypothesis. (1) the death penalty is a deterrent for the crime of murder. (2) Conservative states are more likely to employ the death penalty. Null hypothesis, (1) the death penalty has no effect on the murder rate. (2) political leanings of a state do not determine if they have the death penalty.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methodology
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Appendix A
7. Bibliography
Research Objectives and Themes
This report investigates the correlation between the implementation of the death penalty, state murder rates, and political leanings. The primary goal is to determine if the death penalty acts as a deterrent to crime and to assess whether conservative states demonstrate a higher propensity for utilizing capital punishment.
- The deterrence effect of the death penalty on murder rates.
- Statistical analysis of state-by-state homicide data.
- The role of political affiliation (Red vs. Blue states) in penal policy.
- Critique of existing literature regarding capital punishment trends.
- Empirical verification of the relationship between state color and death penalty legislation.
Excerpt from the Book
Methodology
Online resources were consulted, http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org , in order to determine the independent nominal variable death penalty and the dependent ratio variable murder rate per 100,00. The murder rate for each of the 50 states for the year 2009 were recorded in appendix A. These variables were then entered in to a t-test to determine their significance.
In order to determine the independent variable Color of state, a 2008 presidential election map was consulted ("Election map", 2008). This Map of the state showed whether a state was red or blue depending on how they voted in the 2008 presidential election. These figures were also recored in appendix A. The dependent nominal variable death penalty and the independent nominal variable state color were then entered into chi-square Calculator to determine the significance of the numbers.
Summary of Chapters
1. Introduction: This chapter outlines the controversy surrounding the death penalty and introduces the hypotheses regarding its deterrent effect and its relationship to state political orientation.
2. Literature Review: The author evaluates previous studies by Radelet, Laycock, and Berk, highlighting methodological flaws and debating the effectiveness of capital punishment as a deterrent.
3. Methodology: This section details the data collection process, including the use of 2009 murder rates and the classification of states as red or blue based on the 2008 presidential election.
4. Results: This chapter presents the statistical findings via two tables, showing the relationship between death penalty legislation, murder rates, and political categorization.
5. Discussion: The author interprets the statistical results, concluding that the death penalty lacks a significant deterrent effect, while confirming that conservative states are more likely to employ it.
6. Appendix A: This section provides the raw data set listing each state, its political color, death penalty status, and murder rate.
7. Bibliography: Lists the sources and academic references cited throughout the report.
Keywords
Death penalty, capital punishment, homicide rates, murder rates, deterrence, Red states, Blue states, political orientation, statistical analysis, T-test, Chi-square, penal policy, criminology, legislation, US states.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core subject of this report?
The report examines the relationship between the death penalty, its potential as a crime deterrent, and how it is applied based on the political affiliation of different US states.
What are the primary themes discussed?
The key themes include the deterrent effect of capital punishment, the influence of political ideology on state laws, and a statistical critique of how homicide rates are measured across various jurisdictions.
What is the primary research question?
The study aims to answer whether the death penalty actually deters murder and whether conservative (Red) states are statistically more likely to use the death penalty than liberal (Blue) states.
Which scientific methods were employed?
The author performed a t-test to analyze the relationship between the death penalty and murder rates, and a chi-square test to determine the significance of the association between state color and death penalty implementation.
What does the main body of the work cover?
It covers a literature review of existing studies, the methodology for data collection, the presentation of results through statistical tables, and a discussion of the findings in the context of state-level policies.
Which keywords characterize this work?
Key terms include death penalty, deterrence, homicide rates, Red states, Blue states, and statistical significance.
Did the study find that the death penalty reduces murder rates?
No, the study concluded that the null hypothesis—that the death penalty has no significant effect on the murder rate—was supported by the statistical data (p=.098).
Is there a significant link between a state's political color and its use of the death penalty?
Yes, the Chi-square analysis resulted in a p-value of .000787, indicating that there is a statistically significant relationship, with conservative states being more likely to employ the death penalty.
What are some of the exceptions noted in the report regarding state political color?
The author notes that Alaska, North Dakota, and West Virginia serve as exceptions to the general trend where political color usually predicts the use of the death penalty.
Why does the author suggest further studies?
The author notes that other variables, such as total state population and geographic location, may influence murder rates and penal policy, suggesting that these factors need further investigation.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Dana Bowen (Autor:in), 2015, The Death Penalty in Democratic and Republican States and its Effects on a State’s Murder Rate, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/926020
