This coursework aims to present behavioural science approaches as part of the research programmes course. The coursework places greater emphasis on the research discipline of sustainable marketing and audit. The detailed presentation of the overall behavioural approach with its numerous junctions is presented right after the introduction, which is part of the second section. Sections three and four outlines a brief summary, an analysis of the behavioural scientific approach, the applied research method and findings as well as a critical evaluation of the performed behavioural approach of both the sustainable marketing and audit paper. Section five aggregate the critical appraisal of both behavioural science approaches that are given in section three and four and place them into relationship to the overall behavioural approach. Finally, section six contains the conclusion.
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. THE BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH
3. AUDIT PAPER
3.1 SUMMARY
3.2 BEHAVIOURAL SCIENTIFIC APPROACH
3.3 HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT, APPLIED RESEARCH METHOD AND FINDINGS
3.4 CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH
4. SUSTAINABLE MARKETING PAPER
4.1 SUMMARY
4.2 BEHAVIOURAL SCIENTIFIC APPROACH
4.3 APPLIED RESEARCH METHOD AND FINDINGS
4.4 CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH
5. CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF BEHAVIOURAL APPROACHES
6. CONCLUSION
Research Objectives and Themes
This work explores the application of behavioural science within economic research, specifically focusing on the fields of auditing and sustainable marketing. The primary objective is to demonstrate how behavioural approaches—by challenging the traditional assumption of rational decision-making (homo economicus)—can provide more accurate explanations and innovative solutions for complex, real-world business scenarios.
- Analysis of motivated reasoning in auditing and its impact on misstatement adjustments.
- Investigation of consumer behaviour and heuristic information processing in sustainable marketing.
- Evaluation of experimental methodologies within behavioural business research.
- Critical appraisal of the strengths and limitations of behavioural science in economic contexts.
- Application of dual-process models to understand decision-making mechanisms.
Excerpt from the Book
Confirmation Bias
Humans are usually convinced to examine the condition of reality rationally. However, they often confirm reality which they are already convinced of (Kunda, 1990). The process of thinking with a directional motive is generally unconscious and unintentional. Targeted introspection leads to desired results. Introspection signifies the search for suitable information in the memory. In order to maintain a positive self-image, humans tend to remember own successes rather than failures, among other things.
It is possible that only certain units of knowledge are combined in the human’s memory when processing information, which support the desired conclusions (Kunda, 1990). This is explained by the following example. Let us assume, that someone wants to buy a new mobile phone and, therefore, he/she starts to evaluate various options even though he/she already has a preference for a particular manufacturer, before purchasing a good. Consequently, external factors/information are derived from the environment that confirm the preferred outcome as well as information which can be used as a justification against alternative outcomes or solutions (Heinen, 1969; Bellinger, 1988). The tendency to gather and prioritise information that strengthen own convictions and reject those which refute them is called confirmation bias (Kunda, 1990).
Summary of Chapters
1. INTRODUCTION: This chapter introduces the discipline of business administration and outlines the necessity of behavioural science approaches as a remedy for the limitations of traditional, production-oriented models.
2. THE BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH: This section discusses the departure from the rational homo economicus assumption, introducing psychological and sociological patterns to better explain actual decision-making.
3. AUDIT PAPER: This chapter examines how client pressure and materiality impact auditors' judgements, using the theory of motivated reasoning.
3.1 SUMMARY: Provides an overview of an experimental study involving 143 German auditors regarding offsetting misstatements.
3.2 BEHAVIOURAL SCIENTIFIC APPROACH: Explores the psychological foundations of motivated reasoning and the influence of directional versus accuracy motives.
3.3 HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT, APPLIED RESEARCH METHOD AND FINDINGS: Details the formulation of hypotheses concerning client pressure and the statistical results of the experimental design.
3.4 CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH: Highlights the limitations of generalizing experimental audit findings to complex, real-world practice.
4. SUSTAINABLE MARKETING PAPER: Focuses on the effectiveness of promotional cues for organic products using heuristic and systematic information processing models.
4.1 SUMMARY: Summarizes a study on 487 participants exploring how monetary and non-monetary promotions affect organic versus conventional products.
4.2 BEHAVIOURAL SCIENTIFIC APPROACH: Discusses the dual-process model (System 1 and System 2) and how heuristic processing explains deviations from rational consumer choice.
4.3 APPLIED RESEARCH METHOD AND FINDINGS: Describes the 2x2x2x2 experimental design and the findings regarding the superiority of non-monetary premiums for organic products.
4.4 CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH: Addresses the external validity issues and the situational nature of findings in behavioural marketing experiments.
5. CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF BEHAVIOURAL APPROACHES: Reviews the ideological and methodological critiques of behavioural economics, including its perceived lack of generalizability.
6. CONCLUSION: Synthesizes the core insights, confirming the value of behavioural approaches as a complement to traditional business research methods.
Keywords
Behavioural Science, Economic Research, Audit, Sustainable Marketing, Motivated Reasoning, Bounded Rationality, Heuristics, Decision-making, Homo Economicus, Consumer Behaviour, Dual-Process Model, Experimental Design, Materiality, Client Pressure, Promotional Effectiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the central focus of this research?
The research examines the application of behavioural science in business administration, specifically evaluating how psychological factors influence decision-making in the distinct fields of auditing and sustainable marketing.
What are the primary themes discussed in the paper?
The central themes include the critique of the rational homo economicus model, the impact of motivated reasoning on professional judgement, the dual-process theory of human cognition, and the effectiveness of marketing promotional strategies.
What is the main objective of the study?
The primary goal is to show that behavioural approaches allow for a more nuanced understanding of human behaviour that traditional, rational-economic models fail to capture.
Which scientific methods are employed throughout the document?
The paper primarily utilizes experimental designs, specifically between-subject experiments with human participants, to analyze decision-making patterns in auditing and consumer purchasing contexts.
What topics are covered in the main body of the text?
The main body details two specific case studies—one on audit misstatements and client pressure, the other on the efficacy of promotional cues for organic products—alongside a critical appraisal of behavioural methodologies.
Which keywords best characterize this academic work?
The work is best characterized by terms such as Behavioural Science, Bounded Rationality, Motivated Reasoning, Heuristics, and Experimental Methodology.
How does the audit study incorporate behavioural science?
It applies the theory of 'motivated reasoning' to demonstrate that auditors may unconsciously bias their search for misstatements when influenced by client pressure to reach a desired reporting outcome.
What is the significance of the findings in the marketing study?
The study provides empirical evidence that consumers process information differently depending on the product type (hedonic vs. utilitarian) and promotional format (monetary vs. non-monetary), suggesting that non-monetary premiums are more effective for organic products.
What is the main critique of the behavioural approach presented here?
The main critique is that behavioural research is often overly descriptive and lacks generalizability, as findings are frequently context-specific and derived from controlled laboratory settings rather than real-world markets.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Simon Valentin (Autor:in), 2021, Behavioural Science Approaches in Economic Research, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/986069
