This paper re-imagines the animal in J.M. Coetzee’s "The Lives of Animals”. It focuses on how Coetzee’s narrative problematizes dominant discourses through questioning their authority. Furthermore, the narrative offers alternatives to anthropocentric conceptions of the animal that are based upon reason-centred and dualistic thought. The duality of human versus animal is explored alongside other dualities deconstructed in the text, such as fiction versus non-fiction, and philosophy versus literature.
Coetzee’s representation of these constructs and their interconnectedness is investigated, specifically with regard to positively developing human-animal relations. Through exploring what Coetzee calls the 'sympathetic imagination', his alternative contribution to the field of human-animal relations will be considered. This study focuses on the space for re-imagination that Coetzee has provided with "The Lives of Animals".
It highlights the role literature can and ought to play in this re-imagination, and why this re-imagination is necessary for the development of human-animal relations. Posthumanism will be used as a theoretical lens throughout, as it appears to resonate closely with Coetzee’s project. Both the form and the content of the text will be analysed, highlighting their interconnected significance in Coetzee’s project and the continued relevance of interventions such as this.
J.M. Coetzee’s "The Lives of Animals" (1999) is a literary representation of, and intervention into, human-animal relations. It is an experimental literary destabilization of the generic boundaries that underlie the systematic (mis)representation and (mis)treatment of nonhuman animals, specifically their mass commodification in contemporary societies. The text provides a critique and negotiation of anthropocentric reason and its ramifications for nonhuman animals.
Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Chapter One: Studying The Lives of Animals – Situation, Reception and Theory 7
1.1. Introduction 7
1.2. Situating The Lives of Animals 8
1.3. Critical Reception 16
1.4. A Posthumanist Reading 18
1.5. Conclusion 28
Chapter Two: Coetzee and Unsettling Boundaries of (Re)presentation 30
2.1. Introduction 30
2.2. Coetzee’s Multimodal Metafiction 31
2.3. Coetzee’s Relation to The Lives of Animals 40
2.4. Coetzee’s Multi-layered Responses 51
2.5. Conclusion 62
Chapter Three: Disconnections in The Lives of Animals 64
3.1. Introduction 64
3.2. Human versus Animal 65
3.3. Reason versus Feeling 75
3.4. Rationality versus Imagination 85
3.5. Conclusion 94
Chapter Four: Establishing Connections in The Lives of Animals 96
4.1. Introduction 96
4.2. Elizabeth and the Animal 97
4.3. Rational Feelings and Human-Animal Interconnection 105
4.4. Imaginative Realities and Human-Animal Relations 114
4.5. Conclusion 122
Conclusion 124
Research Objectives and Thematic Focus
This study examines J.M. Coetzee’s "The Lives of Animals" as an experimental literary work that destabilizes generic boundaries and provides a critical intervention into contemporary human-animal relations. By exploring how the narrative problematizes anthropocentric reason and dualistic thought, the research aims to highlight the potential of literature and the "sympathetic imagination" to foster alternative, non-hierarchical ways of relating to nonhuman animals.
- The role of literature in re-imagining human-animal relations.
- Critique of anthropocentric and dualistic Western philosophical discourses.
- Posthumanist, postcolonial, and ecofeminist theoretical perspectives.
- The significance of metafiction and multimodal representation in Coetzee’s project.
- The ethical necessity of empathy and the "sympathetic imagination".
Excerpt from the Book
2.2. Coetzee’s Multimodal Metafiction
In The Lives of Animals, speech and writing, and imagination and reality become intertwined. The following section explores the ways in which the text crosses these categorical boundaries of (re)presentation and its effects on its content. Firstly, the multimodal nature of the text is discussed, including its use of speech and text, and fiction and non-fiction in a way that blurs boundaries between them. Secondly, the metafictional aspects of the text are investigated. The uncertainty around whether it is a work purely of imagination, or a work of real critical enquiry, due to its multi-layered and reflexive critique within a fictional framework, confuses boundaries of (re)presentation. Lastly, the significance and the potential effects of this multimodal, metafictional approach to the topic of the animal are discussed in relation to rhetoric and its possible impact on reception.
The Lives of Animals is a textual fiction made up of two lectures that contain non-fictional criticism, which were originally presented as a real lecture in an academic setting, to a real audience. As Giovanelli notes, it is “caught up in a middle ground between sheer fiction and the public domain of intellectuals, academy and writers” (2011: 65). Moreover, it is caught up in a middle ground between speech and writing, making it a multimodal work on more than one level. In the most basic sense, multimodality is a theory of communication and social semiotics. There are a number of different approaches to multimodality, which describes communication practices in terms of textual, auditory, linguistic, spatial, and visual modes used to get messages across (Lutkewitte, 2014: iv). The collective use of some or all of these modes contributes to rhetorical situations, or opportunities for increasing an audience's reception of concepts or ideas. Multimodality can change and enhance the way an audience perceives information by utilising different modes simultaneously, thereby increasing the modes of reception. With The Lives of Animals, Coetzee utilises the modes of oral linguistic communication, which involves an aural reception by an audience, not only at the Tanner Lectures, but also in his own fictional depiction of lectures within a textual work.
Summary of Chapters
Chapter One: Studying The Lives of Animals – Situation, Reception and Theory: This chapter situates Coetzee's work within the field of human-animal relations, discussing its critical reception and outlining the posthumanist theoretical framework applied throughout the study.
Chapter Two: Coetzee and Unsettling Boundaries of (Re)presentation: This chapter analyzes the complex multimodal and metafictional form of the text, arguing that its experimental structure is inseparable from its critical content and thematic engagement with human-animal relations.
Chapter Three: Disconnections in The Lives of Animals: This chapter investigates the ideological dualisms represented in the text, highlighting how Coetzee uses his protagonist's struggles to critique anthropocentric conceptions of the animal, while also revealing the limitations in these polarized approaches.
Chapter Four: Establishing Connections in The Lives of Animals: This final analytical chapter explores the affirmative possibilities created within the text, focusing on how imaginative realities and interconnection between human and nonhuman animals can be nurtured through the sympathetic imagination.
Keywords
J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, Posthumanism, Human-Animal Relations, Sympathetic Imagination, Anthropocentrism, Metafiction, Multimodality, Ecofeminism, Postcolonialism, Animal Rights, Ethics, Literature and Philosophy, Representation, Receptivity
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core subject of the work?
The work focuses on J.M. Coetzee's "The Lives of Animals" as a literary exploration and critique of human-animal relations, specifically challenging anthropocentric and dualistic Western ideologies.
What are the primary thematic areas covered?
The key themes include the critique of human-animal dualism, the function of the "sympathetic imagination" in ethics, the interplay between literature and philosophy, and the role of posthumanist theory in reconsidering our treatment of nonhuman animals.
What is the central research objective?
The research aims to investigate how Coetzee uses experimental narrative forms to destabilize rigid, reason-centered conceptions of the animal and to propose literature as a viable space for re-imagining these relations.
Which scientific or theoretical methods are employed?
The study utilizes a posthumanist reading, which is further informed by postcolonial and ecofeminist perspectives, to analyze the interconnectedness of form and content in Coetzee's text.
What topics are addressed in the main body?
The main body examines the text's multimodal and metafictional nature, identifies various ideological disconnections between humans and animals (such as reason vs. feeling), and explores how the text establishes affirmative connections through imaginative literature.
Which keywords best characterize the study?
Key terms include Coetzee, posthumanism, human-animal relations, sympathetic imagination, anthropocentrism, metafiction, and ethical representation.
How does the author interpret Elizabeth Costello's rejection of philosophy?
The author interprets Costello's rejection as a strategic critique of the limitations of rationalist, instrumentalist Western thought, suggesting instead that literature offers a more inclusive and receptive mode for engaging with the nonhuman other.
What role do the "Reflections" section and the footnotes play in Coetzee’s work?
These elements are analyzed as paratextual, metafictional tools that further blur the boundaries between fiction and non-fiction, reinforcing the complexity of the work and challenging the reader to reconsider their own interpretive biases.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Amy Wattam (Autor:in), 2019, Re-imagining the Animal in J.M. Coetzee’s 'The Lives of Animals'. Unsettling Boundaries of Representation, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/987377
