Register or log in at GRIN

Your e-mail-address or password is wrong
Register now
For new authors: free, easy and fast
This will be used as your user name, please specify a valid e-mail address

Lost password

Your e-mail-address or password is wrong

Request a new password
The Civil War - A social or an economic decision close

Please wait

Please install the Adobe Flash Player if no e-book is displayed.

The Civil War - A social or an economic decision

Essay, 2004, 11 Pages
Author: Mareike Rolef
Subject: English - Applied Geography

Details

Event: Advanced Essay Writing: Literary and linguistic topics/ United States Presidency
Institution/College: University of Cologne (Institut für Englische Sprache und ihre Didaktik )
Tags: Civil, Advanced, Essay, Writing, Literary, United, States, Presidency
Category: Essay
Year: 2004
Pages: 11
Grade: 2,0
Language: English
Archive No.: V117700
ISBN (E-book): 978-3-640-21626-0
ISBN (Book): 978-3-640-21633-8
File size: 127 KB

Abstract

Unquestionably, the abolition of slavery played an important role in the Civil War during the Lincoln Administration; but the question is whether the liberation of the Africans was the main aim of this war, or if this purpose just served as one single step on the way to complete a mission of higher importance: to gain the power over the Southern states of America and to force the union of America. Reasoning in respect of this controversial issue proceeds with an introductory section which gives a brief survey of important events of the past, to provide a better understanding of the circumstances which gave rise to the struggles of the Civil War. The second part of this essay concentrates on arguments which demonstrate why America did not have any special reasons to start a war on the basis of economic aims and the third part consists of several arguments which support the idea that the main aim of the Civil War was the preservation of the American Union rather than the abolition of slavery. At the end, there will be a short summary of the main arguments and there will be a final conclusion.


Excerpt (computer-generated)

Universität zu Köln

Institut für Englische Sprache und ihre Didaktik

Advanced Essay Writing: Literary and linguistic topics/ United States Presidency

SS 2004

Essay:

The Civil War - A social or an economic decision?

M. Rolef


Unquestionably, the abolition of slavery played an important role in the Civil War

during the Lincoln Administration; but the question is whether the liberation of the Africans

was the main aim of this war, or if this purpose just served as one single step on the way to

complete a mission of higher importance: to gain the power over the Southern states of

America and to force the union of America.

Reasoning in respect of this controversial issue proceeds with an introductory section

which gives a brief survey of important events of the past, to provide a better understanding

of the circumstances which gave rise to the struggles of the Civil War.

The second part of this essay concentrates on arguments which demonstrate why America did

not have any special reasons to start a war on the basis of economic aims and the third part

consists of several arguments which support the idea that the main aim of the Civil War was

the preservation of the American Union rather than the abolition of slavery.

At the end, there will be a short summary of the main arguments and there will be a final

conclusion.

In 1619, a Dutch ship put in at Jamestown and sold twenty Negroes it had brought

over from Africa as part of its cargo. This event initiated a grave chapter of American history

which has always been accompanied by ethnic conflicts; it was the chapter of slavery, which

allowed some people to declare other people to be objects and this event in 1619 proved to be

a portent of the disaster that was to come.

At that time, bound labour was common in all the colonies because of the intense labour

shortage and many settlers earned their passage to the "New World", and that of their

families, by indenturing themselves for a term of several years after which they would be free.

At least some of the early Africans were treated as indentured servants, because there are

records of free blacks in the Chesapeake area in the 1650′s. They had the same status as those

debtors who had to pay back their prepaid tickets in a seven-year stretch. However, about that

time, the white colonists determined that

blacks

would be slaves for the term of their lives and

their children would be slaves as well.

Slaves became the backbone of the Southern plantation system. The Southern colonies relied

on certain cash crops such as tobacco, rice and indigo and slavery provided the least

expensive and most reliable source of labour.

1


At that time, the general attitude was that the black population was of minor biological quality

combined with the assumption that the black population was inferior and this served as a

justification for the general idea of slavery.

In the seventeenth century, when finally a large number of slaves from Africa were

taken to Virginia and Maryland, the institution of slavery with all its negative accompanying

phenomena was established and seemed to remain irreversible. The rights of all African

slaves were now restricted and controlled by slave owners.

About 1700, the number of slaves increased to the considerable number of twenty percent of

the population of the Southern states; most of them worked in the Carolinas, especially in

South Carolina with its large rice plantations and at Charleston harbour. In order to avoid

moral scruples of slave owners, people even quoted passages of the Old Testament which

seemed to legitimate slavery.

In the early nineteenth century, the question of slavery became a national issue.

Numerous leading personalities of the North believed that slavery was gradually dying out

because slavery had never been as extensive in the Northern colonies. Slavery did not make

economic sense in the Northern economies and many people from the North objected to the

forced bondage of human beings; The expectation proved false, for suddenly new economic

issues like: the growing cotton industry, the cultivation of tobacco, sugar cane and the

cultivation of certain fruits, made slavery more profitable for employers and step by step the

new generation of Southern farmers supported the concept of slavery.

Extreme economic and social discrepancies and the resulting political differences

between the Northern states and Southern states of America pointed the way to insuperable

problems between both sides.

Whereas the Southern states almost completely concentrated on the production of

cotton, sugar and tobacco, by exploiting slaves, the Northern states contributed their part to

the gross income of America with financial or economic services. Since their existence, there

had always been the one or other conflict between the North and the South but when Abraham

Lincoln was elected as president of the United States of America without the consent of the

South, the situation escalated and the South felt forced to form a confederation with all

2



Comments

No comments yet

Add Comment
Your comment is reviewed before being published

Other users also were interested in the following titles:

Erstellen einer schriftlichen Hausarbeit

Author: Claudia Nickel
Presentations, Models, Tutorials, Instructions, 2006 Download as PDF-file for 4,99 EUR

Grundtechniken wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens

Author: Maik Philipp
Presentations, Models, Tutorials, Instructions, 2004 Download as PDF-file for 5,99 EUR

This text can be quoted and accessed from this url:

http://www.grin.com/e-book/117700/the-civil-war-a-social-or-an-economic-decision
please wait Please wait