The study focused on the deliberateassessment of the Banner Programs of the division aligned to the core thrusts of DepEd classified as Access, Quality, and Governance. This research utilized the descriptive-comparative-quantitative research design. A selected 150 elementary teachers, 35 secondary teachers together with the 37 school heads were identified as participants of the study through random sampling technique.
Frequency and mean percentage score were used to determine the level of implementation of the Banner Programs while ANOVA was used to determine whether there are any statistically significant difference between the assessment of the public school principals, public elementary and secondary teachers, and the division-based personnel reports.
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Literature Review
III. Research Questions
IV. Scope and Limitation
V. Research Methods
A. Sampling
B. Data Collection
C. Ethical Issues
D. Data Analysis Plan
VI. Results and Discussion
VII. Conclusion and Recommendation
Research Objectives and Core Themes
The primary objective of this research is to perform a systematic triangulation assessment of the division-based Banner Programs in Cavite, evaluating their implementation levels across the core pillars of Access, Quality, and Governance. The study aims to identify discrepancies and alignment between the assessments provided by teachers, school heads, and official division reports to facilitate continuous organizational improvement.
- Triangulation of program implementation assessments
- Evaluation of DepEd core thrusts (Access, Quality, Governance)
- Comparative analysis of stakeholder perceptions (teachers vs. school heads)
- Validation of program effectiveness for learners and personnel
- Strategic recommendations for educational sustainability
Excerpt from the Book
I. Introduction
In accordance to the Republic Act No. 9155 (RA 9155) or the Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001, the mandate and VMCV of the institution were pronounced wherein the Schools Division Superintendent (SDS) together with the Assistant Schools Division Superintendents (ASDS), as its senior leaders, lead the Schools Division Office of Cavite Province. They set the direction of the division through its strategic Division Education Development Plan (DEDP).
The division mantra #ParaSaBatangKabitenyo is a clear overarching advocacy and commitment for relevant, accessible, inclusive, and quality basic education of Cavite learners through its exemplar curriculum implementation and school governance and operations recognized in the entire. In order to sustain the commitment to excellence and continuous improvement, the SDS launches an annual tagline wherein the tagline for 2019, “Gamechanger: Raising the Bar, Reinventing the Norm” which strengthen the division as an industry lead in giving the direction of other divisions in observance of the Transparent, Ethical and Accountable (TEA) Governance to foster legal and ethical behaviour in all interactions.
Through this mantra, the division of Cavite formulated and implemented the Division Banner Programs as the Division Key Performance Indicators classified into three goals such as: Access, Quality, and Governance. The programs/projects under the goal to improve access through universal participation are: Project KALINGA, Project OK sa DEPED, and Project SHED; in goal to improved the learning outcomes or under the Quality are: Project AGAP, Project Power It Up, Project SPARK, Project I-Likha, Project SALIKSURI, and Project HI-TEACH; and under Governance, the goal to improve the efficiency and governance of the division is the Project PRO LEAD.
Chapter Summaries
I. Introduction: Outlines the legal framework and the strategic organizational vision of the Schools Division Office of Cavite, identifying the specific Banner Programs categorized under Access, Quality, and Governance.
II. Literature Review: Synthesizes previous studies and academic theories regarding instructional supervision and formative evaluation to establish a theoretical foundation for the research.
III. Research Questions: Defines the specific inquiries regarding the implementation levels of the banner programs and the presence of statistically significant differences in stakeholder assessments.
IV. Scope and Limitation: Clarifies the parameters of the study, specifying the number of participants and the ten selected banner programs under investigation.
V. Research Methods: Details the quantitative research design, sampling techniques, and data gathering protocols employed to ensure ethical and accurate results.
VI. Results and Discussion: Presents the statistical findings and comparative analyses of the triangulated assessment data using Likert scale interpretations and ANOVA testing.
VII. Conclusion and Recommendation: Summarizes the key findings regarding program efficacy and provides actionable advice for the Department of Education Province of Cavite to improve future implementation strategies.
Keywords
Assessment, Banner Programs, Access, Quality, Governance, DepEd, Instructional Supervision, Triangulation, Quantitative Research, Implementation, Strategic Planning, Educational Leadership, Performance Indicators, Cavite, Project Management.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the central focus of this research?
The study focuses on the deliberate assessment and evaluation of ten specific Banner Programs implemented within the Division of Cavite, aligned with the Department of Education’s core thrusts.
What are the primary thematic areas covered?
The research evaluates programs based on three main pillars: Access, Quality, and Governance.
What is the primary objective of the study?
The goal is to determine the level of program implementation through a triangulation process involving assessments from teachers, school heads, and division-based personnel reports.
Which research methodology is employed?
The study utilizes a descriptive-comparative-quantitative research design, employing random sampling and statistical tools such as Frequency, Mean Percentage score, and ANOVA.
What does the main body of the work address?
The main body presents the program context, reviews relevant literature, details the quantitative methods, and discusses the statistical results of the triangulated stakeholder assessments.
What are the characterizing keywords of this work?
Key terms include Assessment, Banner Programs, Access, Quality, Governance, Instructional Supervision, and Quantitative Research.
How were the Banner Programs assessed across different stakeholder groups?
The programs were assessed using Likert scales ranging from 1 to 4, where participants evaluated specific indicators, resulting in classifications ranging from 'Emerging' to 'Exemplary'.
What specific statistical difference was found in the Access pillar?
The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p-value of 0.0158) among the assessments provided by the different participant groups, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis for this category.
How does the study conclude regarding the Quality pillar?
In contrast to the Access pillar, the study found no significant difference among stakeholder assessments for the Quality programs, resulting in the acceptance of the null hypothesis.
What is the suggested future direction based on the findings?
The author recommends that the division revisits its implementation plans, reviews the program matrix for a more holistic approach, and conducts further studies focused on the long-term impact of these programs.
- Citar trabajo
- Theresa Obrero (Autor), 2021, Banner Programs of the Division. A Triangulation Assessment by Teachers, School Heads and Personnel on its Implementation in the Division of Cavite, Múnich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1138576
