This dissertation focuses on the concept of state cooperation as it applies within the context of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The study examines the extent to which the cooperation of states facilitates the role of the ICC in fulfilling its objective of arresting impunity on the international stage. Despite the fact that the Rome Statute bestows upon states an obligation to cooperate with the ICC, the court has over the years continued to face significant instances of non-cooperation which has been identified as one of the major challenges facing the court in the achievement of its mission of combating international crimes and ending impunity for such crimes.
The study adopts qualitative research based on doctrinal method of legal research, making use of a content analysis of primary and secondary sources of data. Findings of this study reveal that indeed, the concept of state cooperation is a fundamental requirement for the effective functioning of the ICC. This study also reveals that the ICC continues to experience significant instances of non-cooperation from states for several reasons including: the lack of enforcement powers, conflicting obligations, interests and immunities, domestic and international politics, and a perception of bias by African states. To address the problem of non-cooperation, this study recommends the restriction of the application of the doctrine of immunity as it applies to the ICC, amongst others. The study further recommends for an improvement in the ICC's collaboration with regional/continental organizations so as to facilitate and improve on the level of states cooperation with the International Criminal Court.
Table of Contents
1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1.3.1 Main Research Question
1.3.2 Specific Research Questions
1.4 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
1.4.1 Main Objective
1.4.2 Specific Objectives
1.5 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
1.6 LITERATURE REVIEW
Gaps in Literature
1.7 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
1.7.1 The Triple Pronged Theory
1.7.2 The Distributive Theory of Criminal Law
1.7.3 The Retributive/Denunciatory Theory of Punishment
1.8 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE RESEARCH
1.9 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
1.10 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
1.11 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
1.12 DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS
1.13 SYNOPSIS OF THE CHAPTERS
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 STATE COOPERATION: AN ESSENTIAL CONCEPT UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW
2.2.1 Meaning of the Concept of State Cooperation under International Law
2.2.2 Manifestations of State Cooperation under International Law
2.2.3 State Cooperation within the Perspective of International Organisations
2.3 STATE COOPERATION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE ROME STATUTE LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
2.3.1 State Cooperation within the Rome Statute: Legal Framework
2.3.2 Institutional Framework for State Cooperation under the ICC Statute
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 PROCEDURES FOR INVOKING STATE COOPERATION UNDER THE ROME STATUTE
3.3 MANIFESTATIONS OF THE CONCEPT OF STATE COOPERATION IN PRACTICE
3.3.1 The Cooperation Agreement with the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
3.3.2 The Cooperation Agreement with the Central African Republic (CAR)
3.3.3 The Cooperation Agreement with Ivory Coast
3.3.4 The Cooperation Agreement with the Republic of Uganda
3.4 CONSEQUENCES FOR FAILURE TO COOPERATE UNDER THE ROME STATUTE
3.4.1 The Assembly of State Parties (ASP) Procedures relating to non-cooperation
3.4.2 The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Procedures relating to non-cooperation
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 THE CONCEPT OF STATE COOPERATION UNDER THE ICC STATUTE AS WHOLLY EFFECTIVE
4.3 CHALLENGES FACED BY THE ICC WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF COOPERATION
4.3.1 Failures of the ICC within the Context of the Cooperation of States: Consequences of Non-Cooperation
4.3.1.1 Kenya’s Non-Cooperation with the International Criminal Court
4.3.1.2 Libya’s Non-Cooperation with the International Criminal Court
4.3.1.3 Non-Cooperation by Sudan, Malawi, DRC, Jordan, and South Africa in the Arrest of Al-Bashir
4.3.1.4 Non-Cooperation of the United States of America with the International Criminal Court
4.3.2 REASONS FOR NON-COOPERATION OF STATES WITH THE ICC
4.3.2.1 Conflicting obligations, interests and immunities
4.3.2.2 Domestic and international politics
4.3.2.3 The Lack of Enforcement Powers
4.3.2.4 Choice of Cases: Perceptions of Bias
4.5 CONCLUSION
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
5.3 RECOMMENDATIONS
5.3.1 Restriction of the Application of the Doctrine of Immunity
5.3.2 Improving the Credibility of the ICC
5.3.3 Improving Collaboration between the ICC and Regional/Continental Organisations
5.4 CONCLUSION
Research Goal and Core Topics
This dissertation investigates the vital role of state cooperation within the International Criminal Court (ICC) framework. It analyzes how the obligation of states to assist the court is fundamental to ending impunity for international crimes, while identifying systemic challenges, such as non-cooperation and conflicting political interests, that hinder the court's effectiveness.
- The regulatory and institutional framework for state cooperation under the Rome Statute.
- Practical challenges to cooperation, including the lack of internal enforcement powers.
- The impact of state non-cooperation on the effectiveness of ICC proceedings and investigations.
- The role of international organizations (UNSC, ASP) in mediating state cooperation.
- Potential solutions to enhance cooperation, including the re-evaluation of head-of-state immunity.
Excerpt from the Book
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Despite the fact that the Rome Statute bestows upon states an obligation to cooperate with the ICC, the ICC has however continued to face significant instances of non-cooperation by States. This non-cooperation has been identified as one of the major challenges facing the court in the achievement of its mission. This is because the most fundamental condition for the effective functioning of the court is the cooperation of States. When States’ non-cooperation is not effectively tackled, the court faces a very uncertain future. The impacts of state’s non-cooperation include the fact that it has led to the court’s inability to proceed with trials based on the failure of states to cooperate in the arrest and surrender of persons alleged to have committed crimes within the jurisdiction of the court.
Non-cooperation has also over the years resulted in the delay of proceedings of the court which has resulted in higher operational costs. The inefficiency of the court resulting from the non-cooperation of states has also had a negative impact on the willingness of some states to cooperate with the court. Reason why several proposals have been made to address this problem of non-cooperation in order to promote cooperation between States so as to aid the court in the achievement of its mission. However, none of these proposals have been able to sufficiently and concretely deal with the problem of non-cooperation and guarantee the absolute cooperation of States with the court.
Summary of Chapters
CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL INTRODUCTION: This chapter introduces the dissertation by discussing the background, research objectives, and the legal framework that necessitates the study of state cooperation within the ICC.
CHAPTER TWO: THE CONCEPT OF STATE COOPERATION UNDER THE ICC STATUTE: LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS: This chapter examines the definition and legal foundations of state cooperation in international law and specifically under the Rome Statute.
CHAPTER THREE: STATE COOPERATION IN PRACTICE: APPLICATION OF THE CONCEPT UNDER THE ROME STATUTE: This chapter analyzes how state cooperation has been applied in reality, using case studies like the DRC, CAR, Ivory Coast, and Uganda.
CHAPTER FOUR: STATE COOPERATION: APPRAISAL OF ITS EFFECTIVENESS UNDER THE ROME STATUTE OF THE ICC: This chapter evaluates the effectiveness of the cooperation regime and explores reasons for non-compliance, such as political motives and immunity issues.
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION: The final chapter summarizes the research results and provides specific policy recommendations to improve cooperation, such as restricting immunity and strengthening regional collaboration.
Keywords
International Criminal Court, Rome Statute, State Cooperation, Impunity, Legal Framework, Non-cooperation, Head of State Immunity, International Justice, Enforcement Powers, Human Rights, International Organizations, Judicial Assistance, Arrest and Surrender, Complementarity.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this dissertation?
The dissertation focuses on the concept of state cooperation as a fundamental requirement for the effective functioning of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in its mission to combat international crimes.
What are the central themes of this research?
The central themes include the legal obligations of states under the Rome Statute, the practical and procedural methods for invoking cooperation, and the political/institutional obstacles that prevent states from complying.
What is the core research question?
The primary research question asks to what extent state cooperation facilitates the ICC’s objective of curbing impunity for international crimes.
Which methodology is employed in this research?
The study adopts a qualitative, doctrinal legal research methodology, utilizing content analysis of primary and secondary sources, including statutes, academic journals, and case law.
What does the main body discuss?
The main body examines the mechanisms of the Rome Statute, provides evidence of successful cooperation (e.g., in the DRC and Uganda), and highlights instances of non-cooperation (e.g., Sudan, Kenya, and the U.S.).
Which keywords characterize this work?
Key terms include State Cooperation, Rome Statute, ICC, Impunity, and International Criminal Justice.
How does the dissertation explain the role of state immunity in ICC cases?
The author argues that state immunity is frequently misused as a justification or "excuse" by state actors to avoid fulfilling their legal obligations to cooperate with the ICC, particularly in the arrest of sitting leaders.
What recommendations does the author make to improve ICC effectiveness?
The author suggests restricting the broad application of the doctrine of state immunity, fostering better awareness and credibility among African states to reduce bias perception, and deepening collaboration with regional/continental organizations like the AU and EU.
- Citar trabajo
- Akoted-Daniel Manchang Oben (Autor), 2022, State Cooperation within the Context of the International Criminal Court. A Critical Reflection, Múnich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1416377
