Momentum political situation on the ground in Kosovo can be described as "position in a chess mat. De facto, Kosovo is an independent state in many ways, but de jury political prospects are dark integration. Facts on the ground give Kosovo the right to citizenship, and insist that the international community together to walk the roads that are part of the Euro-Atlantic integration. Development policies in Kosovo have been stuck arguing on developments in the region, will however, be good examples to follow in the region states state that these are in advance with these process integration. The challenges now and in this video will future Bowl are so light and slim to be achieved given that the region countries that are following the procedure as such we need to speed up the pace towards European processes with a commitment to great. Kosovo remains much work to do in economic and political sphere, the addition of capacity development in whole. Therefore new strategies should build political integration and long-term medium term if want to be part of the integration of the region think that there may conclude these processes only the brightest European dedication and work.
At a glance
- Applies the Copenhagen criteria to Kosovo’s political, economic and legal reforms
- 38 sources in the bibliography
Table of Contents
The document does not contain a table of contents.
Objectives and Topics
The work examines Kosovo’s prospects for European Union integration through the challenges of building institutions and meeting European political, economic, legal and administrative requirements. It asks, in substance, what reforms and processes Kosovo must pursue on the path toward EU membership.
- Post-war institution building and the transfer of powers
- The Standards for Kosovo and the European Partnership
- Political, economic and legal accession criteria
- Public administration and the rule of law
- Sectoral reforms and future integration priorities
Excerpt from the Book
Challenges in institution building and transfer of powers to Kosovo institutions
Immediately after the war, the politics of Kosovo have shown important points that were filling the vacuum as plan and creating a government of Kosovo, which the government will be parallel with UNMIK, until these institutions are able to complete govern Kosovo. State structures in Kosovo was meant to create a protective force by the KLA, which the army would be transferred to the Kosovo Protection Corps (KPC), which it was based on the Resolution 1244, UNMIK and where, created a protective political institutions within Kosovo.
Since the UNMIK mission in Kosovo began to be built and government institutions that half of June 1999 to be closer to the state government, this time the Security Council issued Resolution 1244, end now Independence of Kosovo was inevitable as an issue in the future. But to come to this, Kosovo rams you to build an institutional issues took to build the basements of these, it took time and dedication from almost the foundation.
In February 2006 the Special Representative M. Ahtisar points examined in the future of Kosovo, church make the future status of Kosovo and it’s institution-building. Problem with full importance and challenges were to create issues that Kosovo and its institutions have active state in the next moments Kosovo was prepared to lead the future of the state itself, but these challenges were not easy to overcome as the people of Kosovo as well as the EU and other European and international factors. A problem and a challenge to meet the demanding processes were called as "Standards for Kosovo" based on similar principles, which are located in the Copenhagen Convention, and as such, Process Standards and the Stabilization and Association have always gone in parallel and have reinforcement each other. Great interest to establish standards before status, which became a priority while Steiner (Michael Steiner), presents a plan for political change. In his address, it was addressed to the Security Council of the United Nations since April 2002, presented an approach that had order to meet the standards before status. This presented an eight-point plan, as it was called "benchmarks for Kosovo" (bend for Kosovo). These standards were announced for an indefinite period, without any definition of progressive.
Chapter Summaries
Challenges in institution building and transfer of powers to Kosovo institutions: The author discusses post-war governance, the Standards for Kosovo and the gradual transfer of responsibilities from international authorities to Kosovo institutions.
Political-Institutional Reform in Kosovo and meeting the criteria: This section considers institutional reforms and the political, economic, legal and administrative requirements associated with EU accession.
Administrative fields: The text addresses public administration, service delivery, administrative capacity and the role of the judiciary in the reform process.
Future political activities towards EU integration processes: The author considers the integration pathway and reforms across areas including minority rights, the economy, agriculture, transport, energy and justice.
Political challenges and fulfill their Kosovo: The section sets out political and economic priorities alongside European standards and the need for legislative and administrative capacity.
Conclusion: The author returns to EULEX, institutional coordination, rule of law and the continuing need for reform.
Keywords
Kosovo, European Union integration, institution building, Copenhagen criteria, Standards for Kosovo, European Partnership, Stabilization and Association Process, public administration, rule of law, EULEX, legislative alignment, minority rights
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this work about?
It examines Kosovo’s challenges and priorities on the path toward integration into the European Union.
What are its main themes?
The work addresses institution building, accession criteria, public administration, the rule of law and sectoral reform.
What is the main objective?
Its central concern is to identify the institutional and policy changes associated with Kosovo’s European integration.
What research method does the author use?
The document presents a descriptive discussion supported by cited publications and policy documents. It does not specify a formal research methodology.
What does the main body cover?
It discusses post-war governance, the transfer of powers, EU criteria, administrative reform and political and economic priorities.
Which keywords characterize the work?
Key terms include European integration, institution building, the Copenhagen criteria, the European Partnership and the rule of law.
How does the work discuss the Standards for Kosovo?
It describes their relationship to institution building and to the longer-term European integration process.
What role does public administration play in the discussion?
The author treats administrative capacity, effective services and reform as important elements of alignment with European requirements.
- Quote paper
- Halim Bajraktari (Author), 2010, Kosovo Challenge of Integration in the European Union, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/152668
