Grin logo
de en es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › Computer Sciences - Artificial Intelligence

Impact of Introducing Personality Traits into LLM Agents on Collaborative Tasks

Summary Details

Multi-agent systems built from large language model (LLM) agents can improve reasoning through discussion and consensus, but they also risk “herding” effects where homogeneous behavior reinforces shared mistakes, and they often waste tokens through redundant utterances after agreement is effectively reached. This study quantitatively evaluates how explicitly assigning personality traits to LLM agents influences both performance and efficiency in consensus-oriented collaboration. We instantiate three agents with Big Five–based personality profiles, encoded as high/low settings on Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Openness, and Neuroticism, and compare three team configurations: No Persona (no explicit traits), Same Persona (all agents share one profile), and Different Personas (agents have distinct profiles). Because persona prompting does not guarantee faithful behavioral realization, we introduce a pre-validation step using a Big Five Inventory (BFI) test and iteratively adjust prompts until the intended trait patterns are reflected. Agents then solve multiple-choice questions using a unified, fixed workflow: initial independent answers, three rounds of debate , and majority voting for the final decision. Experiments on MMLU repeat 50 runs per condition (50 questions per run) and evaluate accuracy, token consumption, and answer-change rates that capture beneficial corrections versus harmful shifts. Results show that Different Personas achieves the highest mean accuracy (0.699) and tends to increase correct-change while reducing incorrect-change, suggesting more effective error correction and robustness against misleading arguments. Persona assignment also improves debate efficiency: token usage is highest without personas and lower with persona prompting, although the most accurate heterogeneous configuration does not minimize tokens, indicating a performance–efficiency trade-off. Overall, the findings support treating personality composition as a controllable design variable for collaborative LLM agents.

Buy now

Title: Impact of Introducing Personality Traits into LLM Agents on Collaborative Tasks

Research Paper (postgraduate) , 2026 , 29 Pages , Grade: 1.0

Autor:in: Akikazu Kimura (Author)

Computer Sciences - Artificial Intelligence
Look inside the ebook

Details

Title
Impact of Introducing Personality Traits into LLM Agents on Collaborative Tasks
Grade
1.0
Author
Akikazu Kimura (Author)
Publication Year
2026
Pages
29
Catalog Number
V1696419
ISBN (PDF)
9783389180662
ISBN (Book)
9783389180679
Language
English
Tags
Large Language Models AI Agent
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Akikazu Kimura (Author), 2026, Impact of Introducing Personality Traits into LLM Agents on Collaborative Tasks, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1696419
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  29  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint