The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) within national cybersecurity systems is reshaping the architecture of state power worldwide, with major implications for governance, institutional autonomy, and democratic accountability. In Zambia, AI-driven cybersecurity tools — including predictive threat‑detection models, biometric authentication systems, and automated surveillance platforms — are expanding alongside the country’s transition toward e‑governance. This convergence offers enhanced digital security and administrative efficiency, yet simultaneously reconfigures power relations within the state, raising concerns about executive dominance and weakened institutional oversight. This thesis evaluates how AI-enabled cybersecurity is transforming state power in Zambia and analyses the consequences for judicial independence, electoral integrity, and democratic legitimacy.
Conceptually, the study positions AI as a dual-use technology: strengthening national protection while expanding the state’s capacity to monitor, classify, and anticipate citizen behaviour. Empirically, the research uses a mixed‑methods design combining quantitative measures of electoral integrity including biometric verification performance, cybersecurity incidents, and misinformation patterns with qualitative insights from interviews with legal experts, civil society actors, cybersecurity practitioners, and governance scholars. Legislative and policy documents are analysed to trace how AI technologies are framed, regulated, and embedded in public‑sector infrastructures.
Findings show that AI-driven cybersecurity tends to centralise authority in executive agencies by creating information asymmetries and introducing algorithmic systems that operate beyond effective legislative or judicial scrutiny. The judiciary’s limited technical capacity to interrogate algorithmic evidence further constrains practical autonomy. Additionally, digital vulnerabilities, opaque biometric systems, and algorithmic misinformation pose emerging risks to Zambia’s electoral process. Public perceptions reveal support for digital security but concerns about surveillance, data misuse, and lack of transparency.
The thesis concludes that AI-driven cybersecurity is not inherently democratic or authoritarian; its effects depend on regulatory safeguards, institutional checks, and accountability mechanisms.
Acheter maintenant
- Citation du texte
- Maliro Ngoma (Auteur), 2026, Assessing AI Driven Cybersecurity and the Transformation of State Power, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1705045
