Grin logo
en de es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › Tourism - Hotel Industry / Catering

Customer-Centric Revenue Management

Requirements, Implementation, Application - a Critical Evaluation

Summary Excerpt Details

The purpose of this paper is to initiate a discussion on the feasibility of customer-centric revenue management [CCRM] in the hotel industry. Therefore, the requirements of this practice will be analysed to define subsequently implementation strategies, which are based on a framework of customer loyalty and profitability. Further, these implementation strategies will be used to analyse the execution of CCRM in a casino resort hotel. The paper will conclude with a discussion on the feasibility of CCRM by summarizing implementation challenges and by assessing its potential effect on customers’ perception of fairness in revenue management.

Excerpt


Table of Contents

Index of Figures & Tables

Introduction

Requirements of Customer-Centric Revenue Management
Revealing Customer Profitability

Implementing Loyalty and Profitability into Revenue Management

Application: A Case Study of the Harrah’s Cherokee Casino & Hotel
Analysis of the Cherokee ’ s Approach to Customer-Centric Revenue Management

Concluding Thoughts on Customer-Centric Revenue Management

References

Index of Figures & Tables

Figure 1: Comparison between conventional costing and ABC

Figure 2: Customer loyalty categories and strategies by Reinartz and Kumar

Figure 3: Segment-based RM strategies

Table 1: Harrah’s Cherokee Casino & Hotel segmentation summary

Introduction

“Selling the right seats to the right customers at the right prices” (Smith et al., 1992: 8) has been the bottom line of airline yield management (YM) since its first implementation in the early 1970s (Cross et al., 2009). Kimes (1989) states that an operation should have the following characteristics to apply effectively YM:

(1) ability to segment markets
(2) perishable inventory
(3) product sold in advanced
(4) low marginal sales cost
(5) high marginal production cost
(6) fluctuating demand

Whereas Lieberman (1993) and Schwartz (1998) contradict with Kimes (1989) by arguing that perishable inventory is the only necessary condition for YM, this single as well as all other factors are still applicable to lodging operations. Consequently, YM entered the hospitality industry in the mid-1980s (Cross et al., 2009). In contrast to airline YM hotel revenue management (RM) uses variable room rates and length of stay to manage inventory and to balance capacity and forecasted demand based on historical data and current booking pickup (Noone et al., 2003). Jauncey et al. (1995: 25) define RM as “an integrated, continuous and systematic approach to maximizing room revenue through the manipulation of room rates in response to forecasted patterns of demand.” Therefore, its focus is not the maximization of yield but of revenue as indicated by the name change of yield to revenue management (Cross, 1997).

However, the strategic levers of room rates and length of stay only maximize the revenue generated from a single transaction and do not address optimal long-term profit, as they do not consider the varying lifetime value of a customer while managing demand (Noone et al., 2003). The incorrect usage of RM may have a negative impact on customer’s perception of the service company and could therefore diminish customer loyalty (Shoemaker, 2003). Hoang (2007) shows this issue at the example of overpricing, which may produce higher revenue in the short-term but ignore the long-term value of possible repeat customers. However, the author also argues that discounting to encourage short-term demand may hurt long-term profitability, as customers’ willingness to pay full could be reduced. In addition, research by Shoemaker and Bowen (2003) shows that RM negatively affects loyal customers as these are less likely to spread positive word-of-mouth but even more likely to check rates at other properties if yielded traditionally. To balance the short-term revenue opportunities to the long-term yield of a customer is one of the major issues RM is currently facing (Cross et al., 2009). Orkin defines this vision as follows:

A future vision for RM speaks of a day when each guest is a market segment of one and the availability of rates for a requested stay would depend on a guest’s past history or forecasted future with the hotel (as cited in Helsel and Cullen, 2006: 158).

Therefore, RM needs to develop into an approach considering a customer’s lifetime value based on his/her retention and loyalty. Cross and Dixit (2005) name this concept customercentric revenue management (CCRM).

The purpose of this paper is to initiate a discussion on the feasibility of CCRM in the hotel industry. Therefore, the requirements of this practice will be analysed to define subsequently implementation strategies, which are based on a framework of customer loyalty and profitability. Further, these implementation strategies will be used to analyse the execution of CCRM in a casino resort hotel. The paper will conclude with a discussion on the feasibility of CCRM by summarizing implementation challenges and by assessing its potential effect on customers’ perception of fairness in RM.

Loyalty programs have become a commodity in hospitality businesses to track detailed purchase patterns (Cross et al., 2009). Moreover, advanced property management systems store customers’ demographics, booking sources and sales data in customer relationship management (CRM) databases. However, Noone et al. (2003) state that these data sources are rarely used in RM decision making albeit this data may allow examining lifetime value and profitability on an individual customer basis, and consequently provide the necessary support for CCRM.

Reinartz and Kumar (2002) argue that the relationship between customer loyalty and profitability is relatively weak considering the popular notion of loyal customers being less expensive to serve, being less price-sensitive and generating new business leads. Consequently, customers seeming to be loyal may not have the highest customer lifetime value. The authors further conclude that this weak relationship is due to “the crudeness of the methods most companies currently use to decide whether or not to maintain their customer relationships” (Reinartz and Kumar, 2002: 90).

Frequently asked questions

What is the main topic of this document?

The document primarily discusses Customer-Centric Revenue Management (CCRM) in the hotel industry, contrasting it with traditional Revenue Management (RM) and highlighting the importance of considering customer lifetime value.

What are the key components of Revenue Management (RM) mentioned in the document?

The document mentions variable room rates and length of stay as key strategic levers in hotel Revenue Management, used to manage inventory and balance capacity with forecasted demand.

What are the shortcomings of traditional Revenue Management according to the document?

Traditional Revenue Management focuses on maximizing revenue from a single transaction and may not consider the varying lifetime value of a customer, potentially negatively impacting customer loyalty.

What is Customer-Centric Revenue Management (CCRM)?

Customer-Centric Revenue Management (CCRM) is an approach that considers a customer's lifetime value based on their retention and loyalty, aiming to balance short-term revenue opportunities with long-term customer yield.

What data sources are available for implementing CCRM, according to the text?

The document mentions loyalty programs and advanced property management systems that store customer demographics, booking sources, and sales data in customer relationship management (CRM) databases as potential data sources.

What is the RFM method, and what are its limitations according to Reinartz and Kumar?

RFM (recency, frequency, and monetary value) is a method that considers the revenue generated by a customer, the frequency of purchases, and the last purchase made. Reinartz and Kumar argue that it doesn't account for customer profitability or the probability of future purchases.

What are the requirements for an operation to effectively apply Yield Management (YM)?

According to Kimes (1989), an operation should have the following characteristics to apply effectively YM: (1) ability to segment markets, (2) perishable inventory, (3) product sold in advanced, (4) low marginal sales cost, (5) high marginal production cost, (6) fluctuating demand.

What is the vision for Revenue Management according to Orkin?

Orkin's vision for Revenue Management involves a future where each guest is treated as a market segment of one, and the availability of rates depends on their past history or forecasted future with the hotel.

What is the purpose of this paper?

The purpose of this paper is to initiate a discussion on the feasibility of CCRM in the hotel industry, analyzing the requirements of this practice and defining implementation strategies based on customer loyalty and profitability.

Excerpt out of 18 pages  - scroll top

Buy now

Title: Customer-Centric Revenue Management

Research Paper (postgraduate) , 2010 , 18 Pages , Grade: A

Autor:in: Shanin Schuessler (Author)

Tourism - Hotel Industry / Catering
Look inside the ebook

Details

Title
Customer-Centric Revenue Management
Subtitle
Requirements, Implementation, Application - a Critical Evaluation
College
University of Brighton  (School of Service Management)
Course
Contemporary Issues in International Hospitality
Grade
A
Author
Shanin Schuessler (Author)
Publication Year
2010
Pages
18
Catalog Number
V172306
ISBN (eBook)
9783640921881
ISBN (Book)
9783640921799
Language
English
Tags
revenue management case study activity-based costing customer profitability analysis ABC CPA customer-centric revenue management customer loyalty yield management hospitality hotels
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Shanin Schuessler (Author), 2010, Customer-Centric Revenue Management, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/172306
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • https://cdn.openpublishing.com/images/brand/1/preview_popup_advertising.jpg
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  18  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Payment & Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint