Excerpt
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction and background
1.1 Introduction
1.2 The origin of the sources of the ne bis in idem principle in the European Union
1.3 Ne bis in idem-analysis and comparison of the relevant articles
1.4 The case of Boere
1.4.1 Facts of the case
1.4.2 Judgment and reasoning
1.4.3 Criticism of thejudgment
2. Is an enforcement requirement mandatory?
2.1 Status of Schengen Law
2.2 Status of the Charter
2.3 Hierarchy between Article 54 CISA and Article 50 EuCFR
2.4 The compatibility of Article 54 CISA with EU Law
2.4.1 Incompatibility of Art 54 CISA with Article 50 EuCFR
2.4.2 The influence of general principles
2.4.2.1 Ne bis in idem as a general principle
2.4.2.2 The fundamental rights as enshrined in the ECHR as general principles
2.4.2.3 Scope of the ne bis in idem general principle regarding enforcement
2.4.3 Interim conclusion
2.5 Justification of the enforcement requirement
2.5.1 Justification on the basis of Article 52 (1) EuCFR
2.5.2 Proportionality
2.5.2.1 The impact of mutual recognition
2.5.2.2 Influence ofFree Movement Rights
2.5.2.3 Interim conclusion
2.5.3 Justification using Article 54 CISA as a concretization of Article 50 EuCFR
2.5.4 Interim conclusion
3. The implication of this outcome for European Union Law
3.1 Consequences for Article 54 CISA
3.2 Consequences for the European Arrest Warrant
4. Final conclusion
- Quote paper
- LL.M. European Law (Leiden University) Jana Seydel (Author), 2011, Enforcement or no Enforcement?, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/174432
Similar texts
Publish now - it's free
Comments