Introduction
Since 1982, when the debt crisis broke out in Latin America the continuous presence of IMF and World Bank has become part of the every day life of Latin American countries. While the programs have changed both in nature and in size, the criticism on the structural adjustment programs (SAPs) has been a constant factor throughout the last years(1). The debate on SAPs focused basically(with minor variations) on two key questions: Their effect on the economy and their social costs, the latter including income distribution(2). The tendency of scientific studies reached from vigorous defence of IMF/WB policy to complete rejection.
[...]
_____
1 Cf. e.g. Rainer Tetzlaff, Weltbank und Währungsfond – Gestalter der Bretton-Woods Ära, Opladen 1996, pp. 26-30.
2 Since the beginning of the end of the 80s, environmental costs could be added to this list. Due to the limited extent of this paper they cannot be included.
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT: ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ISSUES
2.1 20 Years of SAPs – An Outline
2.2 Criticism on the BWI
2.2.1 Economic Criticism
2.2.2 Social Criticism
2.2.3 How the BWI deal with criticism
2.3 Conclusions
3. STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT AND DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENT
3.1 The Public Image of the Bretton Wood Institutions
3.1.1 Painful memories
3.1.2 The BWI as US-dependent institutions
3.1.3 The BWI and Neo-liberalism
3.1.4 The Impact on Democratic Development
3.2 Good Governance and its Implications
3.2.1 Good Governance as a WB/IMF policy
3.2.2 Criticism on Good Governance
3.2.3 Good Governance and Democracy
4. CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Objectives and Topics
This paper explores the political impact of Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) implemented by the World Bank and the IMF on Latin American nations. It aims to determine whether these economic interventions influence the democratic development of the region, focusing on how institutional legitimacy and political culture are affected by external economic mandates.
- Analysis of the economic and social consequences of SAPs over the last two decades.
- Examination of the public image of Bretton Woods Institutions in Latin America.
- Evaluation of the "Good Governance" agenda as a component of structural adjustment.
- Theoretical application of political culture to measure democratic impacts.
- Critique of the internal transparency and accountability of global financial institutions.
Excerpt from the Book
3.1.2 The BWI as US-dependent institutions
It was back in 1970 when GALEANO wrote: “There are also some presumably international organisms under those through which the United States exercise their hegemony: The International Monetary Fund and his twin brother, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development”43. The BWI are indeed under strong influence of the United States. The voting power of the US is described above (and stands in a sharp contrast to the “one man one vote” of all UN organisations). The impression is supported by the nationality of the presidents of World Bank and IMF: While the IMF director is always a European approved of by the US, the WB President is always a US citizen44. IMF’s powerful deputy director Stanley Fisher is US citizen, too. The fact that both institution have their seat in Washington and that their catalogue of measures is named after the US capital contributes to the idea that the BWI are indeed a tool of the United States. It comes to no surprise then, when recent articles dealing with the IMF intervention in Argentina maintain: “But it is an open secret that these negotiations will only be fruitful as far as they can count on the consent of the US government which exerts a key influence on the decisions of the IMF“45.
Summary of Chapters
1. INTRODUCTION: Outlines the research focus on the political effects of SAPs in Latin America, noting that economic stability is essential for democratic consolidation.
2. STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT: ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ISSUES: Reviews the evolution of SAPs and summarizes the economic and social criticisms surrounding the BWI's policy interventions.
3. STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT AND DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENT: Investigates the connection between the negative public image of the BWI, the "Good Governance" policy, and the resulting challenges for democratic legitimacy.
4. CONCLUSION: Synthesizes the findings, suggesting that while SAPs have mixed economic results, their political impact on democratic culture requires a shift toward greater institutional transparency and regional representation.
Keywords
Structural Adjustment Programs, IMF, World Bank, Latin America, Democracy, Political Culture, Good Governance, Neo-liberalism, Economic Crisis, Debt Crisis, Sovereignty, Political Legitimacy, Social Costs, Accountability, Participation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core subject of this paper?
The paper examines the political consequences of IMF and World Bank Structural Adjustment Programs on democratic development within Latin American countries.
What are the central thematic fields?
The central fields include economic policy, political culture, institutional image, democratic legitimacy, and the role of "Good Governance" in international development aid.
What is the primary research goal?
The goal is to determine how the adjustment programs of the World Bank and IMF influence democratic development and political power structures in Latin America.
Which scientific method is utilized?
The work employs a non-empirical, analytical approach, synthesizing existing literature, journal articles, and contemporary political discourse to evaluate the political effects of international financial programs.
What topics are covered in the main section?
The main section evaluates the historical context of SAPs, critiques of these programs, the perception of US dependency, the "Good Governance" framework, and its impact on the political legitimacy of democratic states.
How would you characterize this work through keywords?
Key terms include Structural Adjustment, Bretton Woods Institutions, Political Culture, Democratic Legitimacy, and Good Governance.
Why is the concept of "political culture" central to the analysis?
Political culture is used as a theoretical framework to understand how citizens perceive their own power to influence government, which is affected when they feel their sovereignty is undermined by international institutions.
How do the BWI typically respond to criticism regarding their influence?
The institutions often shift their rhetoric toward "sustainable development" or "participatory processes" while maintaining their fundamental economic conditions, often leading to a gap between official policy changes and actual implementation.
- Quote paper
- Sebastian Karcher (Author), 2001, IMF, Worldbank and Democracy, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1975
