Beynon and Dunkerley say that the historic roots of globalization are from the fifteenth century on. They claim that Europeans developed an ‘outward-lookingness’ which made them explore the world in contrast to other powerful nations. The era of exploration originated the first ‘world city’, namely Lisbon because of its accessibility by boat. This step towards globalization led to the expansion of knowledge in technology, geography and even of the mind, what Spybey terms ‘global consciousness’. Furthermore the longing to spread the European culture, and most striking the perception of European time and the concept of the nation-state. “[E]xamining the relationship of nation and globalization will revise our understanding of the crisis of the national state.” “[C]ontemporary globalization is not reducible to a single, causal process, but involves a complex configuration of causal logistics.” But “the following are among globalization’s most significant foundational factors: The expansion of trading relationships and the use of symbolic tokens, of which money is an obvious example; Copernicus’ concept of the world as a globe; The invention of navigational aids and the steady advance of travel technologies (...); The outward expansion of European institutions and culture; Capitalism’s insatiable drive to maximize profit leading it to ‘go global in its postmodern phase and to open up and exploit new markets with new products.”
Table of Contents
1. Identification of the causes and consequences of the phenomena globalization and nationalism and their interaction
Objectives and Topics
This academic text examines the complex interplay between the forces of globalization and the persistence or transformation of nationalism. It explores how globalization challenges the sovereignty of the classical nation-state, impacts cultural identities, and simultaneously acts as a catalyst for new nationalist movements and local autonomy.
- Historical roots and foundational factors of globalization.
- The erosion and transformation of the classical nation-state.
- The impact of global processes on cultural and national identity.
- The rise of non-territorial identities and nationalist movements.
- The dual role of globalization in both suppressing and fueling nationalism.
Excerpt from the Book
Identification of the causes and consequences of the phenomena globalization and nationalism and their interaction
Beynon and Dunkerley say that the historic roots of globalization are from the fifteenth century on. They claim that Europeans developed an ‘outward-lookingness’ which made them explore the world in contrast to other powerful nations. The era of exploration originated the first ‘world city’, namely Lisbon because of its accessibility by boat. This step towards globalization led to the expansion of knowledge in technology, geography and even of the mind, what Spybey terms ‘global consciousness’. Furthermore the longing to spread the European culture, and most striking the perception of European time and the concept of the nation-state. “[E]xamining the relationship of nation and globalization will revise our understanding of the crisis of the national state.” “[C]ontemporary globalization is not reducible to a single, causal process, but involves a complex configuration of causal logistics.” But “the following are among globalization’s most significant foundational factors: The expansion of trading relationships and the use of symbolic tokens, of which money is an obvious example; Copernicus’ concept of the world as a globe; The invention of navigational aids and the steady advance of travel technologies (...); The outward expansion of European institutions and culture; Capitalism’s insatiable drive to maximize profit leading it to ‘go global in its postmodern phase and to open up and exploit new markets with new products.”
Summary of Chapters
1. Identification of the causes and consequences of the phenomena globalization and nationalism and their interaction: This chapter provides an overview of the historical origins of globalization, its technological and cultural drivers, and how these forces influence the sovereignty and structural integrity of the modern nation-state.
Keywords
Globalization, Nationalism, Nation-state, Cultural Identity, Sovereignty, Global Consciousness, Ethnogenesis, Reflexivity, Reverse Colonisation, Risk Society, Transnational Governance, Human Security, Multiculturalism, Political Sovereignty, Economic Integration
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the fundamental focus of this document?
The document investigates the relationship between globalizing processes and the state of nationalism, specifically looking at how modern globalization shapes, threatens, or revitalizes national identities and state structures.
What are the primary thematic areas covered?
Key themes include the historical development of globalization, the transformation of the 'classical' nation-state, the influence of global capital and communication on local cultures, and the rise of nationalist responses to global pressures.
What is the central research question?
The text seeks to understand how the interaction between globalization and nationalism alters our perception of the national state and how these forces together influence the construction of collective and cultural identity.
Which scientific approaches are utilized?
The work employs a multi-disciplinary synthesis, drawing upon political science, sociology, and historical analysis, referencing key scholars like Giddens, Scholte, and Held to evaluate global impacts on national sovereignty.
What is discussed in the main body of the work?
The main body addresses the erosion of state control, the proliferation of non-territorial identities, the ecological and financial risks of globalization, and the tendency of nationalism to emerge as a defense mechanism for minority groups.
Which keywords best characterize the study?
Essential keywords include Globalization, Nationalism, Nation-state, Cultural Identity, Sovereignty, Ethnogenesis, and Transnational Governance.
How does the author describe the impact of globalization on the 'classical' nation-state?
The author notes that globalization has transformed the classical nation-state, eroding its absolute control over economy, information, and culture, while forcing states to grapple with multiculturalism and shifting power dynamics.
In what way does the author suggest that globalization might act as a catalyst for nationalism?
The text argues that by causing the 'pulling away' of influence from local communities, globalization often triggers a defensive revival of local cultural identities and nationalist movements, particularly among nations without their own sovereign states.
- Quote paper
- MA Sandra Filzmoser (Author), 2011, Identification of the causes and consequences of the phenomena globalization and nationalism and their interaction , Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/200338
