Although it is difficult to prove, the constitution of the United States of America is considered to be one of the most difficult constitution's to amend, as the political scientist Donald Lutz point out (Lutz 1994). Therefore the question arise whether there is a need to alter the amendment procedure, which is enshrined in Article V.
First I will give general ideas of Article V and outline the difficulties that making amendments difficult. Then I will look at arguments against making amendments easier. Following this, I will argue in favour of making amendments easier. My main argumentation will be based on the assumption that not the supermajority rule is the
problem, but the inner logic of Article V itself. Finally I will examine reform proposals, which could solve the problem.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Introduction
- The Difficulty of Amending the US Constitution
- Arguments Against Making Amendments Easier
- Arguments in Favour of Making Amendments Easier
- Reform Proposals
- Conclusion
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This article examines the difficulties involved in amending the US Constitution, argues in favor of making the amendment process easier, and explores reform proposals to achieve this goal.
- The challenges posed by the amendment process in Article V of the Constitution.
- Arguments against making amendments easier, including concerns about politicization and the impact on the Supreme Court.
- The potential benefits of facilitating constitutional amendments, including greater responsiveness to societal change.
- The historical context and evolution of the amendment process, highlighting its impact on the balance of power between the federal government and the states.
- Reform proposals aimed at streamlining the amendment process.
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
The article begins by outlining the complexities of the amendment process, emphasizing the significant hurdles laid out in Article V. It then explores the arguments against making amendments easier, focusing on concerns about politicization, the impact on the Supreme Court's authority, and the potential for short-term policies to be enshrined in the Constitution.
Subsequently, the article presents a compelling argument in favor of making amendments easier, emphasizing the need for the Constitution to adapt to evolving societal norms and values. It argues that the current process hinders the Constitution's ability to respond effectively to changing times.
Finally, the article delves into potential reform proposals aimed at streamlining the amendment process. It examines the controversy surrounding the use of national conventions and explores different interpretations of Article V in relation to the scope and limitations of conventions.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
This article focuses on the key concepts of constitutional amendment, Article V, supermajority rule, political stability, judicial review, national conventions, and reform proposals. It examines the ongoing debate surrounding the amendment process, highlighting the challenges and opportunities associated with making the Constitution more adaptable to a changing world.
- Citation du texte
- Patrick Spieß (Auteur), 2012, The United States constitution. Should it be altered to make it easier to amend?, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/274318
