Page d'accueil >  Catalogue >  Droit - Droit communautaire/européen, Droit international, Droit privé international

To what extent, if any, are most favoured nation clauses able to be invoked by investment treaty claimants suing under one bilateral investment treaty in relation to procedural rights granted by another bilateral investment treaty?


Thèse de Master, 2009

32 Pages, Note: B+


Extrait


Table of Contents

I. Introduction

II. The Relevant Case Law
A. Supporting Cases
1. Emilio Augustin Maffezini v Kingdom of Spain – the seminal case
(a) Exhaustion of local remedies condition
(b) Fork in the road clause
(c) Choice of a particular arbitration forum
(d) Precisely stipulated arbitration rules
2. Siemens A.G. v Argentine Republic
3. Gas Natural SDG, S.A. v Argentine Republic
4. Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v Argentine Republic
5. Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. and AWG Group Ltd. v Argentine Republic
B. Rejecting Cases
1. Tecnicas Medioambientales Tecmed S.A. v United Mexican States
2. Salini Costruttori v Jordan
3. Plama Consortium Ltd. v Republic of Bulgaria
4. Telenor Mobile Communications AS v. Republic of Hungary

III. The general Ability of MFN Clauses to invoke dispute settlement mechanisms

IV. The Scope of a MFN Clause in a Particular Case
A. Is International Arbitration more Favourable than Dispute Settlement before the Domestic Courts of the Host State?
B. The Ejusdem Generis Principle – a First Coarse Filter
C. The Interpretation of a MFN clause
D. Distinction between procedural obstacles and the creation of jurisdiction

V. Conclusion

Fin de l'extrait de 32 pages

Résumé des informations

Titre
To what extent, if any, are most favoured nation clauses able to be invoked by investment treaty claimants suing under one bilateral investment treaty in relation to procedural rights granted by another bilateral investment treaty?
Université
University of Auckland
Cours
International Arbitration
Note
B+
Auteur
Année
2009
Pages
32
N° de catalogue
V282056
ISBN (ebook)
9783656765851
ISBN (Livre)
9783656765868
Taille d'un fichier
614 KB
Langue
anglais
Annotations
Die Arbeit wurde zur Erlangung eines "LL.M." an der University of Auckland, Neuseeland erstellt. Jeweils im Anschluss an eine Blockveranstaltung waren dafür vier derartiger "Research Paper" anzufertigen. Die erzielte Note "B+" entspricht auf einer deutschen Notenskala einer "2,0".
Mots clés
Comparative Law, Commercial Law, International Arbitration
Citation du texte
LL.M. Sebastian Röder (Auteur), 2009, To what extent, if any, are most favoured nation clauses able to be invoked by investment treaty claimants suing under one bilateral investment treaty in relation to procedural rights granted by another bilateral investment treaty?, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/282056

Commentaires

  • Pas encore de commentaires.
Lire l'ebook
Titre: To what extent, if any, are most favoured nation clauses able to be invoked by investment treaty claimants suing under one bilateral investment treaty in relation to procedural rights granted by another bilateral investment treaty?


Textes similaires


Télécharger textes

Votre devoir / mémoire:

- Publication en tant qu'eBook et livre
- Honoraires élevés sur les ventes
- Pour vous complètement gratuit - avec ISBN
- Cela dure que 5 minutes
- Chaque œuvre trouve des lecteurs

Devenir un auteur