About the universal Validity of Selkirk's Account of Compounding: A Comparison between English and Dutch.


Trabajo, 2005

11 Páginas, Calificación: gut


Resumen o Introducción

“Apart from derivation, compounding is the most important event within the process of word formation, i.e. the combination of two or more freely distributed morphemes or morpheme sequences (words) to a compound, whereby - as a rule - the last constituent determines both word of speech, as well as inflectional class” (BUßMANN 2002: 360). This definition of compounding is based on several linguistic works and theories, one of which Elisabeth Selkirk’s Syntax of Words is one of. This work will focus on Selkirk’s account of compounding and make a comparison between the English and Dutch language. Thereby, I will summarize Selkirk’s main points and contrast them to comparable qualities of the Dutch language. My aim is to examine whether or not and in what way Selkirk’s account of compounding in English is universally applicable. This examination will comprise the main topics Headedness, Right-hand Head Rule, Percolation, and First Order Projection Condition. Headedness, Right-hand Head Rule, and Percolation in English In her work The Syntax of Words, Selkirk defines English compounds to be “a type of word structure made up of two constituents, each belonging to one of the categories Noun, Adjective, Verb, or Preposition” (1982: 13). She suggests a context-free grammar for generating compound word structures – consisting of a set of context-free rewriting rules – (cf. 1982: 13 – 16). and furthermore differentiates endocentric compounds from exocentric (nonheaded) compounds. The first kind shows a head customary on the right and is predominant in English (cf. 1982: 19) (such as in snowflake, songwriter, starlight, and underground), while the second, rather exceptional kind has no head at all (cf. 1982: 19) (such as in hunchback, pickpocket, lazybones, cutthroat, and redskin). However, the denotation of a head is controversial. Williams proposed the so-called “Right-hand Head Rule” (RHR), which says that “the righthand member of a morphologically complex word is the head of that word”, what entails that the rightmost constituent determines all the properties of the whole (cf. 1981a: 245 – 274). Such would be the case in the following examples: [...]

Detalles

Título
About the universal Validity of Selkirk's Account of Compounding: A Comparison between English and Dutch.
Universidad
University of Cologne  (Englisches Seminar)
Curso
English Word Formation / Morphology
Calificación
gut
Autor
Año
2005
Páginas
11
No. de catálogo
V37655
ISBN (Ebook)
9783638369367
Tamaño de fichero
510 KB
Idioma
Inglés
Palabras clave
About, Validity, Selkirk, Account, Compounding, Comparison, English, Dutch, English, Word, Formation, Morphology
Citar trabajo
Christian Hensgens (Autor), 2005, About the universal Validity of Selkirk's Account of Compounding: A Comparison between English and Dutch., Múnich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/37655

Comentarios

  • No hay comentarios todavía.
Leer eBook
Título: About the universal Validity of Selkirk's Account of Compounding: A Comparison between English and Dutch.



Cargar textos

Sus trabajos académicos / tesis:

- Publicación como eBook y libro impreso
- Honorarios altos para las ventas
- Totalmente gratuito y con ISBN
- Le llevará solo 5 minutos
- Cada trabajo encuentra lectores

Así es como funciona