Improper management of solid waste poses many challenges to the stakeholders such as residents, council authorities, business community and other support groups. The general objective of the study is to assess the sustainability of waste management in Glendale. The researcher used case study research design in conjunction with mixed methods research in the study. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies were used to collect data. The target population for the study consisted of residents of Valley, Westville Park and Sisk, council authorities, Environmental Management Agency (EMA) officer, waste collectors, members of community based organizations (CBOs) and the environmental health officer. The total population was 569 and the sample size was 235. Stratified systematic sampling was employed to select 220 households and the rest except CBO members were picked using purposive sampling. CBO members were selected using convenience sampling. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaire, interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), observations as well as secondary data. Qualitative data was analysed thematically while quantitative data was analysed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 as well as Pearson Chi square test. The results of the study indicated that solid waste management in Glendale is inefficient. Four and half tonnes of waste is generated per day in Glendale but only 2.0tonnes is collected and 2.5tonnes is left uncollected. It was noted that the waste is mainly decomposable organic. There is widespread illegal dumping of waste, inconsistent collection of waste, insufficient provision of receptacles and the council’s official dump site is illegal. The council dumped waste on an illegal dumpsite characterised by open dumping and burning of waste. It was also noted that the waste was not separated according to type at the source. The study recommended an increase in awareness campaigns to ensure a change in the attitudes of the residents especially in connection with managing sanitary waste. In addition, the council should play its part by collecting waste frequently by increasing the size of its fleet for waste collection. The decomposable organic waste should also be used for generation of biogas.
Table of Contents
- CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
- 1.0 Chapter Introduction
- 1.1 Introduction
- 1.2 Statement of the Problem
- 1.3 Objectives of the Study
- 1.4 Research Questions/Hypotheses
- 1.5 Assumptions of the Study
- 1.6 Significance of the Study
- 1.7 Limitations of the Study
- 1.8 Delimitations of the Study
- 1.9 Definition of Key Terms
- 1.10 Chapter Summary
- CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1 Chapter Introduction
- 2.2 Introduction
- 2.3 Conceptual Framework
- 2.3.1 Elements of SLA
- 2.3.2 Advantages of Sustainable Livelihood Approach
- 2.3.3 Disadvantages of the sustainable livelihoods Framework
- 2.4 Empirical Research
- 2.5 Justification of the Study
- 2.6 Chapter Summary
Objectives and Key Themes
The main objective of this study is to assess the sustainability of waste management practices in Glendale, Zimbabwe. The research uses a mixed-methods approach to analyze the efficiency and challenges related to solid waste management within the specified suburbs.
- Assessment of solid waste management efficiency in Glendale.
- Analysis of the types and quantities of waste generated.
- Identification of challenges related to waste collection and disposal.
- Examination of the role of local authorities and residents in waste management.
- Exploration of sustainable solutions for improved waste management.
Chapter Summaries
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION: This chapter sets the stage for the research, introducing the problem of inefficient solid waste management in Glendale, Zimbabwe. It clearly states the research objectives, outlining the key questions to be addressed. The chapter also defines the scope of the study, specifying its limitations and delineating the key terms used throughout the research. The significance of the study is highlighted, emphasizing its contribution to understanding and improving waste management practices in the area. The introduction lays a solid foundation for the subsequent chapters, clearly articulating the research's purpose and methodology.
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW: This chapter provides a comprehensive review of existing literature related to solid waste management, particularly focusing on sustainable livelihood approaches. It delves into the conceptual framework guiding the research, exploring the elements, advantages, and disadvantages of sustainable livelihood approaches in the context of waste management. The review also analyzes empirical research relevant to the study, providing a context for the current research and informing its methodology. This chapter connects theoretical understanding with practical applications, positioning the research within a broader body of knowledge.
Frequently Asked Questions: Comprehensive Language Preview
What is the main topic of this research?
The research focuses on assessing the sustainability of waste management practices in Glendale, Zimbabwe. It uses a mixed-methods approach to analyze the efficiency and challenges related to solid waste management.
What are the key objectives of this study?
The main objective is to assess the sustainability of waste management practices in Glendale. Specific objectives include assessing waste management efficiency, analyzing waste types and quantities, identifying challenges in waste collection and disposal, examining the roles of local authorities and residents, and exploring sustainable solutions for improvement.
What is the structure of the document?
The document includes an introduction (Chapter 1), a literature review (Chapter 2), and likely subsequent chapters (not fully detailed in the preview). The provided preview offers a table of contents, objectives and key themes, and chapter summaries.
What methodologies are used in this research?
The research employs a mixed-methods approach. While specifics aren't detailed in the preview, this suggests a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods for data collection and analysis.
What are the key themes explored in this research?
Key themes revolve around the sustainability of waste management in Glendale, including efficiency of practices, types and quantities of waste, challenges in collection and disposal, roles of stakeholders (local authorities and residents), and sustainable solutions.
What does Chapter 1 cover?
Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the research, outlining the problem of inefficient waste management in Glendale, stating research objectives and questions, defining the scope and limitations of the study, and highlighting its significance. Key terms are defined, laying a foundation for the entire research.
What does Chapter 2 cover?
Chapter 2 presents a comprehensive literature review on solid waste management, focusing on sustainable livelihood approaches. It explores the conceptual framework, including advantages and disadvantages, and analyzes relevant empirical research to provide context for the current study.
What are the limitations of this study (as mentioned in the preview)?
Specific limitations aren't detailed in the preview, but the preview mentions that limitations are discussed in Chapter 1.
What is the significance of this study?
The study aims to contribute to understanding and improving waste management practices in Glendale, Zimbabwe. The findings will likely inform the development of more sustainable waste management solutions.
Where can I find more information about this research?
The provided preview is a summary. To find more comprehensive information, you would need to access the full research document.
- Quote paper
- Nhamo Marunga (Author), 2015, An assessment of solid waste management in a local authority, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/420956
