This academic paper is based on territorial disputes between China and Tibet.
I am working to unravel the ongoing controversial territorial disputes between Central Tibetan Administration; more specifically the exile Tibetan government in Dharmasala run by 14th Dalai Lama vs. People’s Republic of Chinese administration (PRC) and emphasizing why India has involved in this issue.
This paper proposes a diplomatic strategy to resolve the ongoing territorial conflict between this two. In this scenario, my role is of a mediator and I represent the government of Sweden.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Policy Objectives
- Brief Background of the Disputes
- Parties Involved in China-Tibet Conflict
- Involvement of India in China-Tibet Conflict and Interest of India
- Proposed Tactics to Resolve the Conflict
- Future Scenario of Tibet-China Relations
- Unintended Consequences and Dealing Strategy
Objectives and Key Themes
The objective of this paper is to propose a diplomatic strategy for resolving the ongoing territorial conflict between the Central Tibetan Administration and the People's Republic of China, with a focus on India's involvement. The author, acting as a mediator representing Sweden, aims to find a peaceful resolution.
- Historical perspectives on Tibet's independence versus China's claims of sovereignty.
- The role of ethnic and religious differences in fueling the conflict.
- The involvement of external actors, particularly India and the United States.
- Potential strategies for conflict resolution, focusing on diplomacy and mutual trust.
- The complexities of power-sharing and addressing the concerns of both sides.
Chapter Summaries
Introduction: This paper explores the controversial territorial disputes between the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and the People's Republic of China (PRC), highlighting India's involvement. The author adopts the perspective of a Swedish mediator, aiming to devise a diplomatic strategy for conflict resolution. The introduction sets the stage by outlining the core issue and the author's proposed approach.
Policy Objectives: This section details the specific policy goals the author hopes to achieve through mediation. These include ending the conflict, fostering mutual trust and respect, establishing a balanced Tibetan government with Tibetan participation, upholding international law and human rights, promoting development in Tibet, respecting ethnic and religious minorities, ending violent movements, halting the resettlement of Han Chinese in Tibet, ensuring freedom of expression and political rights, showing respect for the Dalai Lama, involving India in negotiations, and achieving power-sharing between China and Tibet. The overall aim is to fundamentally reshape the relationship between the two parties.
Brief Background of the Disputes: This chapter examines the historical context of the dispute, presenting contrasting Tibetan and Chinese perspectives on Tibet's historical status. The Tibetan perspective emphasizes Tibet's independence, violated by China's 1949 intervention, while the Chinese perspective views Tibet as an integral part of its territory. The chapter traces historical influences on Tibet, including Mongol, Manchu, and British involvement, leading up to the 1959 Dalai Lama's exile and China's subsequent control. The core of the conflict is presented as rooted in differing historical narratives and interpretations.
Parties Involved in China-Tibet Conflict: This section identifies the key actors in the conflict: the PRC and the CTA. It highlights the role of Han Chinese in the Tibetan administration and the division within the Tibetan population regarding their relationship with China. It also touches upon the involvement of external actors, such as the United States and its past support for Tibetan separatists, underscoring the multifaceted nature of the conflict's participants.
Keywords
Tibet, China, Dalai Lama, territorial dispute, sovereignty, independence, India, conflict resolution, diplomacy, mediation, human rights, ethnic conflict, religious conflict, historical narratives, power-sharing, external actors.
Frequently Asked Questions: A Diplomatic Strategy for Resolving the China-Tibet Conflict
What is the main objective of this document?
This document proposes a diplomatic strategy for resolving the territorial conflict between the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and the People's Republic of China (PRC), focusing on India's involvement. The author, acting as a Swedish mediator, aims to find a peaceful and mutually agreeable solution.
What are the key themes explored in this document?
The document explores historical perspectives on Tibet's independence versus China's claims of sovereignty; the role of ethnic and religious differences in fueling the conflict; the involvement of external actors (India, the US); potential strategies for conflict resolution through diplomacy and trust-building; and the complexities of power-sharing and addressing the concerns of both sides.
What is the structure of the document?
The document is structured to provide a comprehensive overview. It includes an introduction, a detailed outline of policy objectives, a background on the historical disputes, an identification of the parties involved (including the roles of India and other external actors), proposed tactics for conflict resolution, a look at potential future scenarios, and a discussion of unintended consequences and strategic responses. Key words and chapter summaries are also provided.
What are the specific policy objectives outlined in the document?
The policy objectives aim to end the conflict, foster mutual trust and respect, establish a balanced Tibetan government with Tibetan participation, uphold international law and human rights, promote development in Tibet, respect ethnic and religious minorities, end violent movements, halt the resettlement of Han Chinese in Tibet, ensure freedom of expression and political rights, show respect for the Dalai Lama, involve India in negotiations, and achieve power-sharing between China and Tibet. The overall goal is to fundamentally reshape the relationship between China and Tibet.
What historical perspectives are considered?
The document examines the historical context from both the Tibetan and Chinese perspectives. The Tibetan perspective emphasizes Tibet's historical independence, violated by China's 1949 intervention, while the Chinese perspective views Tibet as an integral part of its territory. The document traces historical influences, including Mongol, Manchu, and British involvement, leading up to the 1959 Dalai Lama's exile and China's subsequent control.
What is the role of India in the conflict, according to the document?
The document highlights India's significant involvement in the China-Tibet conflict and analyzes India's interests in the region. India's role is considered crucial, and its participation in negotiations is advocated for in the proposed resolution strategy.
What are the proposed tactics for resolving the conflict?
The proposed tactics focus on diplomacy and mediation, aiming to build mutual trust and understanding between the CTA and the PRC. The document emphasizes the importance of power-sharing, respecting human rights, and addressing the concerns of both sides through a negotiated settlement.
What are the key players or parties involved in the conflict?
The key players are the PRC and the CTA. The document also acknowledges the role of the Han Chinese population in Tibet, internal divisions within the Tibetan population, and the influence of external actors like the United States.
What are the potential unintended consequences discussed?
The document addresses the potential for unintended consequences resulting from any proposed resolution strategy. It emphasizes the need for careful consideration and planning to mitigate negative outcomes.
What keywords summarize the main topics of the document?
Key words include: Tibet, China, Dalai Lama, territorial dispute, sovereignty, independence, India, conflict resolution, diplomacy, mediation, human rights, ethnic conflict, religious conflict, historical narratives, power-sharing, external actors.
- Quote paper
- Undergraduate (B.S.S) Sultan Mahmud (Author), 2018, Territorial Dispute. The controversial territorial disputes between Central Tibetan Administration vs. People’s Republic of China and the involvement of India, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/442134
