The importance of the Informal Sector in launching the National Economy in Kenya has been a key issue in the Government Agenda. Supporting training projects for the Jua Kali is expected to foster competitiveness and effectiveness of the labor market as a first step for employment creation. Training activities focus in quality and technological improvements for product development and increasing the capacity of trainees to deal with institutions. In the evaluation of training projects success is measured using indicators on final production and investment lacking data on institutional capacity building. The purpose of this paper is evaluate a training program for Jua Kali using the indicators proposed by the donor, using data from Jua Kali Training Program in Thika funded by EU Micro-Enterprise Support Program Training for associates of the Thika Jua Kali Welfare Association in Kenya.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Literature review on the Informal sector.
3. CISP Thika Jua Kali Training Program, funded by EU Micro Enterprises Support Program.
4. Methods and Data
5. Results
6. Discussion
7. Conclusion.
Research Objectives and Themes
This paper evaluates a training program for the Jua Kali informal sector in Thika, Kenya, funded by the EU Micro-Enterprise Support Program, by analyzing its effectiveness, implementation challenges, and the appropriateness of indicators used for success evaluation.
- Analysis of the role and challenges of the informal sector in the Kenyan economy.
- Evaluation of training projects focusing on product development, business management, and capacity building.
- Assessment of success indicators and monitoring methodologies for training interventions.
- Investigation into the practical constraints faced by informal artisans, such as access to capital and information.
- Review of the relationship between training programs and long-term economic impacts on micro-enterprises.
Excerpt from the Book
3. CISP Thika Jua Kali Training Program, funded by EU Micro Enterprises Support Program.
The donor in the case of CISP Program is the Management Unit of the European Union funds to support Micro-enterprises (MESP). The main objective of MESP is to support sustainable economic growth in Kenya, employment creation and poverty alleviation. The specific purpose of MESP is to improve the performance of Micro-Enterprises (MEs) through intermediaries. The activities of MESP are design to support product development and market and technical skills development, capacity building and credit support to MEs (via intermediaries). MESP fund initiatives that:
• Carry out specific action oriented research on MEs activities.
• Promote information exchange and dissemination, organising or participating ion activities exposing artisans to new products and producers as well as creating quality.
• Raise awareness among artisans and the public.
• Provide information on products, markets, manufacturing techniques, appropriate technologies and machinery to MEs.
• Promote product development, innovation and diversification among MEs.
• Promote links and subcontracting with formal sector industry.
• Offer technical training courses, specially in product development and marketing
Summary of Chapters
1. Introduction: This chapter contextualizes the informal sector in Kenya, detailing its economic importance and the specific challenges regarding training, technology, and government policy.
2. Literature review on the Informal sector.: Provides a historical and academic overview of how the informal sector is defined and characterized, highlighting the transition from traditional views to modern understandings of its role in developing economies.
3. CISP Thika Jua Kali Training Program, funded by EU Micro Enterprises Support Program.: Outlines the chronological development and implementation framework of a specific intervention program designed to improve the management and product skills of local artisans.
4. Methods and Data: Describes the systematic approach taken for data collection, emphasizing participatory methods and the challenges of measuring project success objectively.
5. Results: Analyzes the output data from the training sessions and discusses the limitations of using standard indicators to measure the actual impact on artisan businesses.
6. Discussion: Evaluates the effectiveness of the training, noting that while product development is a key goal, business management training is equally vital for immediate, measurable impact.
7. Conclusion.: Summarizes the findings, emphasizing that the long-term success of Jua Kali training depends heavily on sustained follow-up and broader support structures rather than short-term interventions alone.
Keywords
Jua Kali, Informal Sector, Kenya, Training Program, Capacity Building, Product Development, Micro-enterprises, Employment Creation, Poverty Alleviation, Success Indicators, Business Management, Technology, Economic Development, Thika, Participatory Methods.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core subject of this research paper?
The paper focuses on evaluating training projects for informal workers, specifically the "Jua Kali" sector in Thika, Kenya, and assessing the effectiveness of these interventions.
What are the primary themes discussed?
Key themes include institutional capacity building, the implementation of product development training, challenges in market access, and the role of government and donor policies in the informal economy.
What is the main goal of the research?
The objective is to evaluate a specific training program for the Jua Kali Association using existing donor indicators while critically assessing their relevance and reliability.
Which scientific methodology is applied?
The research utilizes participatory methods, qualitative interviews with trainers and trainees, and comparative analysis of project indicators before and after the training intervention.
What does the main body of the work cover?
It covers the history of institutional support for the Jua Kali, a literature review of the informal sector, a detailed case study of the CISP Thika program, and an analysis of the results from trainee questionnaires.
Which keywords best characterize the work?
Keywords include Jua Kali, informal sector, Kenya, capacity building, and project evaluation.
Why are the success indicators questioned in the paper?
The paper argues that many donor-proposed indicators, such as immediate increases in sales or investment, are unrealistic outcomes for short-term training programs and do not account for the long-term nature of skill development.
What role does the "Jua Kali Welfare Association" play in the program?
The association acts as the primary intermediary for the training project, serving as the link between the trainees (artisans) and the donor/implementation organizations.
What are the major constraints faced by Jua Kali artisans?
Artisans face significant barriers including inadequate access to capital, lack of business management skills, poor infrastructure, insecure workshop environments, and limited access to information.
What is the author's primary conclusion regarding the training program?
The author concludes that while training is essential, a single short-term program is insufficient; sustainable success requires ongoing support, follow-up interventions, and a focus on practical business management skills alongside technical product development.
- Citation du texte
- Maria Victoria Aviles-Blanco (Auteur), 1999, The use of economic indicators in the evaluation of training projects for informal workers in Kenya, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/458710
