Grin logo
de en es fr
Boutique
GRIN Website
Publier des textes, profitez du service complet
Aller à la page d’accueil de la boutique › Politique - Sujet: Politique de développement

Decentralization in Bangladesh.The varying degrees of decentralization from de-concentration, devolution, deregulation

Titre: Decentralization in Bangladesh.The varying degrees of decentralization from de-concentration, devolution, deregulation

Essai , 2016 , 8 Pages , Note: A

Autor:in: Abdul Aziz (Auteur)

Politique - Sujet: Politique de développement
Extrait & Résumé des informations   Lire l'ebook
Résumé Extrait Résumé des informations

The objective of the essay is to (1) examine the concept of decentralization, (2) the varying degrees of decentralization from de-concentration, devolution, deregulation and (3) the benefits and disadvantages of the process for a developing country like Bangladesh, (4) the discussion focuses on evidence from several case studies with particular reference to the Bangladesh Rural Development Board (BRDB) and how and why decentralization was implemented and how successful the process has been for the organization in its objective to reduce poverty.

Extrait


Table of Contents

Introduction

What is decentralization?

The varying degrees of decentralization

Limitations of Decentralization

Advantages of Decentralization

Decentralization in Bangladesh

Conclusion

Research Objectives and Focus

This essay examines the multifaceted concept of decentralization, analyzing its varying degrees and its practical application as a poverty-reduction tool within the public sector of developing nations, with a specific focus on the Bangladesh Rural Development Board (BRDB).

  • Conceptual framework and definitions of decentralization.
  • Categorization of decentralization: de-concentration, delegation, and devolution.
  • Analysis of the benefits and limitations regarding public service efficiency.
  • Evaluation of the BRDB’s role in decentralized rural development and poverty alleviation in Bangladesh.

Excerpt from the Book

The varying degrees of decentralization

Campo & McFerson (2008) suggested that the degree of decentralization could be measured by the extent of independence and self-government the organizations have from central government which the authors suggested progressively increased from ‘de-concentration’ through to ‘delegation’ to full ‘devolution’. De-concentration is considered as a first stage of decentralization and often considered the weakest form of decentralization as it transfers the management responsibility from central government to subordinate staff in districts, provinces and regions and is used mostly by governments based on a system of government in which authority is centralized.

The limitations of de-concentration largely stem from the piecemeal nature of the initiative; the unfamiliar management practices can often limit managerial capacity and cause confusion. In order for de-concentration to be effective, clear guidelines would need to be drawn up by central government to offer a useful policy alternative for a country such as Bangladesh which is engaged in de-centralising its government departments to alleviate rural poverty.

Broader in scope then de-concentration is delegation. Through this form of decentralization central government shifts the responsibility for decision-making of public functions to semi-autonomous organizations, although these organizations are not totally controlled by the central government, they are ultimately accountable to central government.

Summary of Chapters

Introduction: Outlines the core objectives of the essay, focusing on the definition of decentralization and its implementation within the Bangladesh Rural Development Board.

What is decentralization?: Explores complex academic definitions and the general consensus on transferring decision-making power to lower levels of management.

The varying degrees of decentralization: Distinguishes between de-concentration, delegation, and devolution as hierarchical forms of administrative independence.

Limitations of Decentralization: Discusses the risks of fragmented coordination, increased administration costs, and the need for adequate resource allocation.

Advantages of Decentralization: Highlights the efficiency gains, improved responsiveness to local community needs, and the importance of fiscal autonomy.

Decentralization in Bangladesh: Investigates the specific administrative challenges of Bangladesh and the role of the BRDB in utilizing participatory approaches for poverty alleviation.

Conclusion: Summarizes the findings, asserting that despite risks, decentralization is a vital tool for improving public service governance and poverty reduction.

Keywords

Decentralization, Bangladesh, BRDB, Poverty Alleviation, De-concentration, Delegation, Devolution, Public Sector, Governance, Accountability, Rural Development, Fiscal Decentralization, Administrative Reform, Participatory Approach, Empowerment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary focus of this work?

The work focuses on the concept and implementation of decentralization within public administration, specifically analyzing how it serves as a tool for poverty reduction in Bangladesh.

What are the main thematic areas covered?

The main themes include the theoretical definitions of decentralization, its various administrative forms, the challenges of implementation, and its practical impact on rural development organizations.

What is the central research question?

The essay explores how decentralization can bridge the gap between anti-poverty efforts and service delivery, particularly examining the success of the Bangladesh Rural Development Board (BRDB).

Which scientific methods are employed?

The work utilizes a literature-based analysis of academic definitions and secondary case study evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of decentralization policies.

What topics are discussed in the main body?

The main body covers the hierarchical levels of decentralization (de-concentration, delegation, devolution), the associated advantages and risks, and a detailed look at the Bangladeshi public sector.

Which keywords best characterize this publication?

Key terms include decentralization, rural development, poverty alleviation, BRDB, and public sector accountability.

How does the author define the different degrees of decentralization?

The author follows the classification by Campo & McFerson (2008), ranging from de-concentration (the weakest form) to delegation and finally full devolution (the highest degree of independence).

Why is the Bangladesh Rural Development Board (BRDB) specifically highlighted?

The BRDB is analyzed as a primary example of a state-led institution attempting to use decentralized authority and financial power to improve the lives of rural populations.

Fin de l'extrait de 8 pages  - haut de page

Résumé des informations

Titre
Decentralization in Bangladesh.The varying degrees of decentralization from de-concentration, devolution, deregulation
Université
London Metropolitan University
Note
A
Auteur
Abdul Aziz (Auteur)
Année de publication
2016
Pages
8
N° de catalogue
V508170
ISBN (ebook)
9783346070586
Langue
anglais
mots-clé
decentralization bangladesh
Sécurité des produits
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Citation du texte
Abdul Aziz (Auteur), 2016, Decentralization in Bangladesh.The varying degrees of decentralization from de-concentration, devolution, deregulation, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/508170
Lire l'ebook
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
Extrait de  8  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Expédition
  • Contact
  • Prot. des données
  • CGV
  • Imprint