The model of flexibility hypothesized was tested through various algebraic manipulations and derivations and found to be rationally agreeing with value cores and characteristics of a system. A wave is everything we see, hear, sense, or touch in space-time. A wave is sound, light, heat, and unseen thrust or abstract in line with the "wave-particle duality theory".
This model of flexibility 'muv' was used to better understand Amdahl's and Gustafson-Basis's "theoretical system speedup latency" theories. The muv is an expression for value as v ≤ u + s - b, where n is “trials” (frequency, also, efficiency) to enhance a system, v is value, u is a valuable (good, service, or entity), b is a basic (a fundamental medium), and s is a flexibility (i.e. innovation influence, or a highly creative faculty). In fact, there is seemingly numerous approaches to establishing the “mechanics” of value.
Further research on value and its sensitivity based on this research would be done in further studies to establish a link between Einstein's general relativity and quantum field theories. Studying anything rather by means of value and trends allows a common platform to interrelate systems, entities, and objects through quantum field and space-time.
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
"LITERATURE REVIEW"
1.0 INTRODUCTION TO VALUE AS A UNIVERSAL TERM WITH RESPECT TO THE MUV
1.1 THE HUMAN LEVEL ATTAINED
1.2 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT (VALUE EVALUATION)
1.3 VALUE
1.4 BASICS
1.5 VALUABLE
1.6 SLACK
1.7 A Few Conventional Constants:
1.8 Brief History about General Relativity and Quantum Field Theory
CHAPTER 2
METHODOLOGY
2.0 INTRODUCTION [IN THE CONTEXT OF THIS PROJECT WORK: WHY IS THE MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE OF VALUES (MUV) IMPORTANT AND NEEDED?]
2.1 FLUID POINT OF TRANSITION FOR [VTPU]
2.2 COMPARING AMDAHL’S LAW AND GUSTAFSON’S LAW WITH THE MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE OF VALUES, ALSO, LITTLE’S LAW
2.2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.2.1 AMDAHL’S LAW:
2.2.2 DERIVATION OF THE AMDAHL’S LAW
2.2.3 GUSTAFSON’S LAW [i.e. GUSTAFSON BARSIS’S LAW
2.2.4 DERIVATION OF THE GUSTAFSON’S LAW:
2.2.5 LITTLE’S LAW:
2.3 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN WITH THE MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE OF VALUES "MUV" AND FURTHER DERIVATION WITH RESPECT TO IT AND LINING UP WITH AMDAHL’S, GUSTAFSON’S, AND LITTLE’S LAWS [WHICH POSITION IS IT PLACED?]
2.4 DERIVATION OF THE “1/(1 - n)” AND THE "n" OF THE MODEL OF UNIVERSE OF VALUES
2.4.0 FRAME I
2.4.1 With Gustafson’s Law
2.4.2 FRAME II
2.4.3 VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL, WHAT DO THESE MEAN?
2.4.4 FRAME III
2.4.5 FRAME IV
2.4.6 BEFORE SYSTEM IS ENHANCED
2.4.7 AFTER SYSTEM IS ENHANCED
2.4.8 CONCLUDED THEORY
2.4.9 B’ABSOLUTE FOR A SYSTEM
2.4.10 AXIOM 1
2.4.11 AXIOM 2
2.4.12 AXIOM 3
2.4.13 THE EFFICIENCY OF A SYSTEM
2.4.14 CONCLUDED THEORY
2.4.15 THE “n” OF THE MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE OF VALUES (MUV), “p” OF AMDAHL’S LAW, “s” OF AMDAHL’S LAW, “b” OF THE MUV, AND THE “s” OF MUV IN A SIMPLE SYSTEM AND IN A COMPLICATED SYSTEM
2.4.16 NOTE: “VALUE AS FLUID MEDIATOR”
2.4.17 Deduction
2.4.18 Deduction
2.4.19 Deduction
2.4.20 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TRIPLE POINT AND THE CRITICAL POINT
2.4.21 BRIEF LITERATURE REVIEW ON SUBLIMATION
2.5 MECHANICS OF VALUE OF A SYSTEM: [COMPUTING THE “n” OF THE MODEL OF UNIVERSE OF VALUES (MOU = MUV), “p” OF AMDAHL’S LAW, “s” OF AMDAHL’S LAW, “b” OF THE MOU, AND THE “s” OF MOU IN A SIMPLE SYSTEM AND IN A COMPLICATED SYSTEM]
2.5.0 INTRODUCTION
2.5.1 Premise
2.5.2 Deductions/solution
2.5.3 INTEGRATION
CHAPTER 3
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
3.0 INTRODUCTION
3.1 ANALYSIS
3.1.0 In appendix section 7.0
3.1.1 The graphs in appendix sections 7.1 and 7.2
3.1.2 The graphs in appendix section 7.3 and 7.4
3.1.3 The graphs in appendix sections 7.5 and 7.6
3.1.4 The graphs in appendix sections 7.7 and 7.8
CHAPTER 4
RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION
4.0 INTRODUCTION
4.1 With v = 1/ (1 - n) = 1/ (1 – b/ u)
4.2 CONCLUSION
Objectives and Topics
The core objective of this dissertation is to establish "Value Mechanics" as a comprehensive framework, represented by the model of the universe of values (MUV) defined as [b + v ≤ u + s]. By integrating concepts from quantum mechanics, general relativity, and traditional management theories like Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws, the research seeks to create a universal platform for analyzing performance, value enhancement, and system optimization across diverse domains including information technology, economics, and abstract sciences.
- Development of the Model of the Universe of Values (MUV) to quantify and standardize value.
- Comparative analysis of MUV against established computational speedup laws (Amdahl, Gustafson).
- Exploration of "Value as a Fluid Mediator" connecting physical, virtual, and unseen system states.
- Mechanics of system enhancement through frequency-based trial models and "slack" variables.
- Mathematical derivation of critical space-time equations related to system value and performance.
Excerpts from the Book
1.0 INTRODUCTION TO VALUE AS A UNIVERSAL TERM WITH RESPECT TO THE MUV
A basic is a flexibility universality fluidity vessel (that is either universal or empty) or a kind of a clean slate which is a valuable at its raw state or a raw material (raw or basic medium) that can further be enhanced in value. If so, it is likely that human demands for that valuable (good or service or medium) will either rise or fall depending on the nature of the basic (resources). Pindyck and Rubinfeld (1998: 19) posited on the importance of demand that is, “supply and demand analysis is a fundamental and powerful tool that can be applied to a wide variety of interesting and important problems”. In a human, a basic could be thought of as a baby whose brain is a clean slate “tabula rasa”, and Jean Piajet posited that, “at birth the human mind is a blank slate without rules for processing data, and the added data and rules for processing are formed solely by one’s sensory experiences” (John Lock, 2007: 2). We viewed “the sense of value” with the model of the universe of values i.e. the model of universality (the buffer model: bmpm) as the design of a consciously an intelligent means for the analysis and synthesis of enhanced value in a valuable, a systematic-entity, or in an entity achievement, based upon human performance inherent “in it” or “encompassing it”. In other words, again, value tends to a valuable and a valuable means human achievement be it artificial or natural. Where bmpm ≡ the buffer model of performance measurement.
Achievement is performance intrinsic whereby, the level of achievement relies on the levelled leveraged quality w.r.t. performance. Also, some value could be realized when we evaluate a person based on his or her status or level, “The evaluation of human capability as leaders becomes available based on reasonable amounts of personality traits such as sociability, initiative, analytical ability, aggressiveness, optimism, realism, risk taking, honesty, intuition, loyalty, reliability, balance, cooperativeness, etc. (Elliott Jacques and Lydia Morris Brown, 2004: 5).” Can we measure performance and therefore achievement? If so then we can know the level of a valuable and we can separate the value (i.e. a force or time) from the valuable (i.e. matter or enhanced matter or space-time intelligence programmed i.e. "space") in order to know the disparities in order to account for that "levelling-status value magnitude chipped-in". The level of the valuable is proportional to the magnitude of the value. However, we also need a flexible tendency that can determine a valuable in order to actuate a changing effect on this valuable, and this was termed, “slack: i.e. innovations, inventions, discoveries, etc”. Gantt first used the term “slack” in project management and the term slack (float) is the amount of time that a task in a project network can be delayed without causing a delay to subsequent tasks i.e. ‘free-float’ project completion date i.e. ‘total float’ (Mckay and Kenneth N., 2004). The Buffer Model: Value (v) plus basic (b) is less than or equals valuable (u) plus slack (s) [i.e., “v + b ≤ u + s” ----- (1)]
Summary of Chapters
CHAPTER 1: Provides the foundational definitions of value, basics, valuables, and slack within the context of the Buffer Model (MUV), while connecting these to existing scientific concepts like General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.
CHAPTER 2: Outlines the methodology of the work, focusing on the mathematical derivation and algebraic comparison of the MUV with Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws to establish a universal system of evaluation.
CHAPTER 3: Details the data collection and analysis, where experimental growth curves and numerical simulations are used to validate the MUV's applicability to various system performance metrics.
CHAPTER 4: Presents recommendations for applying Value Mechanics to political, engineering, and economic systems and offers concluding theoretical insights into information conservation and singularities.
Keywords
Model of flexibility, Value Mechanics, MUV, Amdahl’s Law, Gustafson’s Law, system performance, slack, value addition, buffer model, critical space-time, singularity, quantum field theory, universal constants, performance measurement, innovation
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary goal of this dissertation?
The dissertation aims to introduce "Value Mechanics" and the "Model of the Universe of Values" (MUV) to create a standardized, universal framework for evaluating performance and value across scientific, economic, and management systems.
What are the core thematic fields covered in this study?
The study intersects information technology management, quantum physics, general relativity, and economic theory to develop a unified mathematical approach for understanding system enhancements.
What is the central research question?
The work essentially asks how value can be mathematically defined and computed across different types of systems, whether they are simple or complex, using a universal "fluid" model.
Which scientific methods are employed?
The author uses algebraic derivations, comparison of established technological laws, and empirical data graphing to validate the MUV's consistency with existing scientific models.
What does the main body of the work focus on?
The main body rigorously defines the components of the MUV (basic, value, valuable, slack), provides derivations for its critical equations, and compares these with Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws in the context of system performance.
Which keywords best characterize this research?
The research is best characterized by terms such as Model of the Universe of Values, Value Mechanics, system enhancement, slack, and universal performance metrics.
How does the author define the term "slack" in this framework?
In this model, "slack" represents flexibility, innovations, inventions, or strategic influences that allow a system to advance or adjust its state, acting as a dynamic variable rather than just a project management delay.
How does the author connect the concept of black holes to the theory?
The author argues that information is conserved in the singularities of black holes, supporting the idea that information is a fundamental, indestructible "value" within the universe.
- Citar trabajo
- Wisdom Yao Dornyo (Autor), 2016, Forerunning value mechanics. The model of the universe of values, Múnich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/519906
