“Without the freedom to make mistakes, people cannot learn to take control of their lives successfully.” These are the words of Guy Standing, a British economist and cofounder of the Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN). The BIEN aims to inform people
about what unconditional basic income (UBI) really is and how it works, based on scientific researches.
But what is the connection between a successful life, making mistakes and the UBI? Humans often assume, that unemployed people, for example are lazy or less intelligent. To confirm these prejudices, it is blamed that everyone has the same opportunities. Unemployed people just do not take these opportunities.
Nevertheless, life experience, education and social skills are not given by nature. Money is essential. People must pay for nearly everything that develops a personality or leads to equal chances. Making mistakes and learning from it is one part of this development, although not everyone has the financial space to try things and make mistakes.
The money that someone owns depends on the income that this person has. To earn money normally a job is needed, but getting a job depends exactly on the things, that make out a personality. To develop this personality money is needed. It is like a vicious circle that cannot be broken.
That is the moment, when the UBI comes into the picture. [...]
Table of Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 Problem Definition and Limitations of Research
1.2 Objective and Organization of Research
2 Definition and Inception of the Unconditional Basic Income
3 Models for the Funding of Unconditional Basic Income
3.1 Basic Income Flat Tax Model
3.2 Transfer Limit Model
3.3 Comparison of the Models
4 Critical Comparison of Two Models of Unconditional Basic Income
4.1 Solidary Citizen's Income
4.2 Emancipatory Basic Income
4.3 Critical Review of the Models
5 Impact of Unconditional Basic Income
5.1 General Impact of Unconditional Basic Income for the Population
5.1.1 Reduction of Bureaucracy
5.1.2 Work-related Impact
5.1.3 Social and Psychological Impact
5.2 Microeconomic Development as a Result of Higher Income
6 Critical Analysis Based on Example Cases
6.1 Example Case: Kenya
6.2 Example Case: Berlin
7 Conclusion
7.1 Summary
7.2 Outlook
Research Objective and Key Themes
This seminar paper investigates the potential societal impacts and functional mechanisms of an Unconditional Basic Income (UBI), with a specific focus on the German economic and social context. It aims to evaluate funding models and practical implementation strategies to determine how a basic income could reshape social welfare systems and address future labor market challenges like those posed by Industry 4.0.
- Mechanisms and theoretical foundations of UBI funding models.
- Comparative analysis of the "Solidary Citizen's Income" and "Emancipatory Basic Income" models.
- Macroeconomic effects and changes in consumer demand behaviors.
- Societal impacts, including bureaucracy reduction and psychological benefits.
- Case studies assessing pilot implementations in diverse economic environments (Kenya and Berlin).
Auszug aus dem Buch
5.1.1 Reduction of Bureaucracy
The first hypothesis is that in consequence of the basic income the bureaucracy can be reduced in a social state like Germany. Exemplary this subchapter looks on the unemployment benefits. In 2019 there are nearly 4 million people that are receiving unemployment benefit. Moreover, approximately 3 million people that are in need do not request any social benefits. Beside the shame and fear of lack of knowledge how to get the benefits is a reason of the missing occupation. It is a result of the high level of bureaucracy. A normal application for a social benefit includes six sides that must be filled and a complex application includes even 20. Moreover, the law for the unemployment benefit has been reformed over 50 times.
The extent of the bureaucracy is high for the government as well. A statistic of 2014 shows, that there are approximately 38 thousand employees of the German Federal Employment Agency (GFEA), which are responsible for the unemployment benefit. If the GFEA had been a company, it would have been in the top 30 of the biggest German companies measured by the employees. The administration and personnel expenses in 2018 equalled approximately € 1 billion. These are funds, which are taken from pots of money that was meant for social benefit.
Summary of Chapters
1 Introduction: Provides the problem definition regarding poverty and labor market changes and outlines the research objective.
2 Definition and Inception of the Unconditional Basic Income: Traces the origins of the concept, specifically referencing Milton Friedman's negative income tax.
3 Models for the Funding of Unconditional Basic Income: Discusses the Basic Income Flat Tax (BIFT) and Transfer Limit (TL) models as financing mechanisms.
4 Critical Comparison of Two Models of Unconditional Basic Income: Analyzes and compares the Solidary Citizen's Income (SCI) and the Emancipatory Basic Income (EBI).
5 Impact of Unconditional Basic Income: Examines the general societal effects, including bureaucratic and psychological impacts, and the microeconomic consequences.
6 Critical Analysis Based on Example Cases: Evaluates practical real-world experiments with basic income in Kenya and Berlin.
7 Conclusion: Summarizes the key findings and provides an outlook on the necessity of further practical experiments.
Keywords
Unconditional Basic Income, UBI, Social Welfare, Germany, Funding Models, Basic Income Flat Tax, Transfer Limit, Solidary Citizen's Income, Emancipatory Basic Income, Industry 4.0, Bureaucracy Reduction, Microeconomic Development, Poverty, Labor Market, Social Security
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core subject of this paper?
The paper explores the concept, funding, and potential societal impacts of an Unconditional Basic Income (UBI), specifically contextualized within the German social and economic system.
What are the primary thematic areas covered?
The main themes include theoretical funding models (BIFT and TL), the comparison of specific UBI approaches (SCI and EBI), the social/psychological impacts of UBI, and the economic effects on markets.
What is the main objective or research question?
The central goal is to determine the potential impact of UBI on society and to analyze how such a system could be functionally implemented and funded in a country like Germany.
Which scientific methods are employed?
The research uses a descriptive and comparative approach, analyzing theoretical economic models and existing case studies (e.g., experiments in Kenya and Berlin) to assess feasibility and impact.
What topics are discussed in the main body?
The main body covers the history of UBI, detailed explanations of financing models, a comparative analysis of policy proposals, an assessment of bureaucracy and social impacts, and a critical analysis of empirical evidence from pilot projects.
Which keywords best characterize this research?
Key terms include Unconditional Basic Income, Social Welfare, Funding Models, Industry 4.0, Bureaucracy Reduction, and Microeconomic Development.
How does the "Solidary Citizen's Income" (SCI) model differ from the "Emancipatory Basic Income" (EBI)?
The SCI model primarily targets poverty reduction within the current tax system, whereas the EBI model is broader, aiming to grant society greater independence and autonomy from the labor market and state influence.
What is the role of the "Transfer Limit" (TL) in these models?
The Transfer Limit represents the income threshold at which the tax burden balances out the received basic income, effectively distinguishing between net recipients and net payers.
Why is the reduction of bureaucracy considered a key benefit of UBI?
Currently, social welfare systems require complex, repetitive applications and extensive administrative management. UBI would simplify this by providing an unconditional payment, thereby reducing administrative costs and the stigma associated with social benefits.
What do the case studies in Kenya and Berlin reveal?
The cases demonstrate that basic income can lead to productive investments in food, infrastructure, and education in developing regions, while in strong economies like Berlin, it can serve as a social safety net to maintain societal connection for the long-term unemployed.
- Quote paper
- Aristoteles Kourtidis (Author), 2019, The Functional Principle and Impact of Unconditional Basic Income, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/542897
