This assignment will deal with the question in what ways markets for science and technology fail and how a government can address to these failures. As approach there will be first the defining of the terms used, followed by a theoretical explanation of market failure and its causes in general. The major consideration will be towards the appropriability of the returns on an innovation. From here on, the possibilities of the state to intervene and its reasons for and against it will be looked at. Then it will be concluded which measures are considered a useful addressing towards this specific kind of market failure and which not. The question behind all considerations on intervention will be how either sufficient property rights are created or lacking property rights are compensated.
Regarding “science and technology” this essay will take any activity inside of a national economy that is aimed to create knowledge of any kind as part of the consideration. It is acknowledged, that “technology” produces private goods with profit as driving incentive, whereas “science” is producing a public good, driven by the evaluation of other scientists (see Stoneman 1995 p. 4). A further distinction of both is not undertaken in this concern, as the question involves both terms and the differences are not considered to be crucial for the further considerations. The Schumpeterian approach that before an innovation as the development of an idea into a marketable product there needs to be the invention, the scientific generation of new ideas, and that an innovation ends with its diffusion is acknowledged as well (see Stoneman, 1987, pp. 8 - 9 ). In the following considerations these processes are considered given as part of the general economic activity. On markets, “property rights” are exchanged, deducted from the surrounding legal institutions, by which an economic agent controls an economic good to a certain extent (See Fritsch et al p.19, p.6). It will be shown that the basis for market failure lies within inadequate property rights for technology and also that to a certain extent, this is economically desirable.
The theoretical concept of “market failure” founds on violations of the conditions necessary for a socially optimal and efficient result in perfect competition, i.e. uncertainty, externalities and indivisibilities (See Acocella, p. 89).
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Market Failure in Science and Technology
- The Appropriability of Innovation Returns
- Government Intervention and its Justification
- Possible Means of Intervention
- Conclusion
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This essay aims to examine the ways in which markets for science and technology fail and how a government can effectively address these failures. The main focus is on the appropriability of returns on innovation and the impact of inadequate property rights. The essay explores the theoretical concept of market failure and analyzes the specific challenges faced by the science and technology sector. It then delves into the potential for government intervention, weighing its advantages and disadvantages.
- Market Failure in Science and Technology
- The Appropriability of Innovation Returns
- Government Intervention in Science and Technology
- The Role of Property Rights
- Balancing Individual and Social Returns on Innovation
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
- The essay starts by defining the terms "science," "technology," and "market failure" and outlining the key characteristics of these concepts. The author emphasizes the importance of recognizing the public good nature of science and the potential for innovation to generate both private and social benefits.
- The chapter focuses on the concept of appropriability and the challenges of securing returns on innovation. The essay explores the factors that contribute to market failure in this context, including uncertainty, externalities, and indivisibilities.
- This section examines the potential for government intervention to address market failures in science and technology. The author explores various approaches to intervention, including patents, subsidies, and regulations, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each method.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
The essay focuses on the following key terms and concepts: market failure, science, technology, innovation, appropriability, property rights, government intervention, patents, subsidies, regulations, public good, externalities, uncertainty, indivisibilities, and social rate of return.
- Citation du texte
- BA (Hons) Business Economics Henning Schmidt (Auteur), 2004, In what ways does the market fail where science and technology are concerned and can the government usefully address such failure, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/68027
