The thesis research is divided into three main categories. Firstly, explaining "Emerging Practices" with definitions of different new trends for overcoming various challenges around the globe. Secondly, by ‘Learning lessons’ from best practices and interviewing Experts in this field and the last part of future experiments in section ‘Future Lab’ where these learnings and Challenges are demonstrated together to form recommendations for future proposals. In future Lab, Challenges which are basis of this thesis study; Learnings which are currently happening; and findings which are recommendations from expertise are collected together to form a catalog.
Further integrating these key elements from catalogue help to create a new future proposal. A design model under three different criteria is made and interpret the level of integrating the key elements. Thus, in this future lab of experiments, successful recommendations are delivered to fulfill the goals and objectives of neighborhood mobility concept.
TOD is a prominent solution considered to overcome major urban issues. However, different interpretations of this concept lead to difficulties in conducting TOD. Implementation of TOD is realized on different scales, varying from macro to micro. This thesis research focus on micro scale implementation which refer to neighborhood scale. With new trend of mobility, transit stations in neighborhood are rather used as mobility hubs or combined with other mobility offers. Many people are increasingly using mobility offers that best suit their situation and combine various transport modes flexible with each other. These models are called multimodal or intermodal of mobility. These mobility offers mostly sharing means of transportation like Car Sharing and Bike Sharing integrated in different ways.
Furthermore, it is identified, whether the neighborhood mobility plan is serving only the residents living around this neighborhood or has effect on urban area too. To understand both the cases, two best practices in each case is explained. So, detail overview study of well operating mobility station ‘SWITCHH’ developed in Hamburg, Germany and mobility plan focusing on its residents; ‘Seestadt Aspern’ in Vienna are reviewed. To investigate the success factor, method to approach from concept level to development level and other criteria’s; expert interviews are conducted from the team of mobility concept developers.
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Challenges
1.2 Goals and Objectives
1.3 Structure
2.0 Transit Oriented Development
2.1 Implementation scales
2.1.1 Macro Level
2.1.2 Micro Level
2.2 Neighborhood level mobility
2.3 Types of Mobility
2.3.3 Multi-modal Mobility
2.3.4 Inter-modal Mobility
2.4 Elements of Mobility
2.4.1 Car sharing
2.4.2 Bike sharing
2.4.3 Miscellaneous
3.0 Neighborhood mobility trends
3.1 Mobility Concept
3.2 Mobility Hub
3.2.1 Tasks
3.2.2 Benefits
3.3 Identify type
3.4 Case Study –Selection Process
3.4.1 Seestadt Aspern, Wien
3.4.1(1.0) Learnings
3.4.2 Switchh Mobility Station, Hamburg
3.4.2 (2.0) Learnings
3.5 Findings - Interview results
3.5.1 Findings
4.0 Catalogue- Method
4.1 Catalogue
4.2 Design Model
4.2.1 Scenario 1
4.2.2 Scenario 2
4.2.3 Scenario 3
4.3 Integration Level
5.0 Conclusion
Objectives and Thematic Focus
This thesis aims to address urban mobility challenges by rethinking neighborhood-scale transport planning through Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). It evaluates how integrated mobility hubs, combining public transit with shared mobility services, can serve as a sustainable solution to reduce private car dependence, improve urban livability, and create efficient, multi-modal transport environments.
- Integration of sustainable TOD principles at the micro/neighborhood scale.
- Review of best practices in multi-modal mobility hubs, specifically in Hamburg and Vienna.
- Development of a comprehensive catalogue of measures categorized by infrastructure, services, and public transit.
- Creation of a design model for future neighborhood mobility adaptable to different urban scenarios.
- Analysis of expert perspectives on the implementation process and success factors for mobility concepts.
Auszug aus dem Buch
1.0 Introduction
Eventually, Urban areas are experiencing serious challenges because of the lack of integration between land use and transportation policy. These give rise to traffic congestion, air pollution, noise pollution, traffic accidents, inequitable access to transport and services, unreliable public transport, overcrowding, urban sprawl, and segregation of community (Alqhatani et al., 2012; Curtis, 2005; Jonsson, 2008). To overcome these challenges for future mobility, a sustainable approach has to be adopted.
The concept of sustainability emerged in the 1980s and 1990s, which became an international priority and global mission in every field. There is no standard directional path to achieve Urban Sustainability (Böhler-Baedeker, Kost, & Merforth, 2014). Therefore, Sustainable development is explained in many ways but the basic fundamental described in Brundtland Commission’s report is ‘‘meeting the present needs without compromising that the future generations will need to meet their own needs’’ (WCED, 1987).
This thesis is divided into three main categories. Firstly, explaining ‘Emerging Practices‘ with definitions of different new trends for overcoming various challenges around the globe. Secondly, by ‘Learning lessons’ from best practices and interviewing Experts in this field and the last part of future experiments in section ‘Future Lab’ where these learnings and Challenges are demonstrated together to form recommendations for future proposals.
Transit Oriented Development (TOD) is a globally recognized approach for achieving sustainability through land-use-transportation integration. It can be used effectively to create high density, compact neighborhoods supported by public transit, to reduce the dependence on private vehicles and the resulting pollution and congestion. Here are various successful examples around the globe in TOD experiments. However, different interpretations of this concept lead to difficulties in conducting TOD planning.
Summary of Chapters
1.0 Introduction: This chapter highlights the urban challenges caused by poor land-use integration and introduces TOD as a sustainable solution for neighborhood-scale mobility planning.
2.0 Transit Oriented Development: This section explores the theoretical framework of TOD, defining implementation scales and the various types and elements of modern shared mobility.
3.0 Neighborhood mobility trends: This chapter analyzes current trends and case studies, specifically focusing on mobility hubs in Hamburg and Vienna to derive practical lessons for neighborhood planning.
4.0 Catalogue- Method: This section presents a structured methodology to integrate infrastructure, services, and public transit elements into a design model for future mobility proposals.
5.0 Conclusion: The final chapter synthesizes findings and research objectives, confirming the effectiveness of mobility hubs in enhancing neighborhood livability and reducing car reliance.
Keywords
Transit Oriented Development, Neighborhood Mobility, Mobility Hubs, Sustainable Urbanism, Multi-modal Transport, Inter-modal Mobility, Shared Mobility, Car Sharing, Bike Sharing, Urban Planning, Infrastructure, Public Transit, Traffic Congestion, Mobility Catalogue, Design Model
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this research?
The research focuses on the micro-scale application of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) to improve neighborhood mobility and sustainability, shifting from private car dependence to multi-modal transport solutions.
What are the central themes of the work?
Central themes include urban sustainability, the development of mobility hubs, integration of shared transport services, and the importance of infrastructure and design in influencing travel behavior.
What is the main objective or research question?
The main objective is to develop a framework and design model for neighborhood mobility that addresses existing urban challenges by integrating shared mobility services with public transport systems.
Which scientific methods were used?
The study utilizes a combination of literature analysis on TOD, a comprehensive review of global best practices (specifically case studies in Hamburg and Vienna), and expert interviews with mobility concept planners.
What is covered in the main part of the thesis?
The main part covers the theoretical foundations of TOD and new mobility trends, empirical analysis of two best-practice case studies, and the creation of a 'catalogue' that categorizes essential measures for successful neighborhood mobility.
Which keywords characterize this work?
Key terms include Transit Oriented Development, Mobility Hubs, Neighborhood Mobility, Multi-modal Transport, and Sustainable Urban Planning.
How does the 'Switchh' project in Hamburg demonstrate neighborhood mobility?
The 'Switchh' project acts as a mobility hub, integrating various sharing options like car-sharing and bike-sharing with existing public transport to provide a seamless, inter-modal travel experience for residents.
What role does the 'Catalogue' play in the design model?
The catalogue serves as a structured framework of design principles—ranging from infrastructure to digital services—that allows planners to implement customized mobility solutions in different urban or suburban scenarios.
How do the proposed design scenarios differ?
The design scenarios differ based on their specific contexts, such as high-density urban blocks, peripheral residential areas, or business parks, each requiring unique combinations of mobility measures to effectively serve their users.
- Citar trabajo
- Harneet Kaur (Autor), 2020, Transit Oriented Development. An Approach To Neighborhood Mobility, Múnich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/824922
