While Bartle stresses that national institutions may protract the introduction of electricity reform, his research is on a more general level and does not explicitly focus on the costs of adaptation resulting from compensating losers of reform and convincing opposing political veto players. By doing so, important nuances of national responses to exogenous reform pressures may be overlooked. This thesis addresses this gap by asking the following research question: What explains the variation in unbundling regime choice between European countries after the Third Electricity Directive? The example of ownership unbundling provides a relevant empirical example to unequivocally comprehend the redistribution of resources resulting from a liberalisation reform initiative. When governments plan to unbundle VIUs, they directly interfere with the interests of several private and public actors.
Thus, depending on the exact interest and governance configurations, full unbundling induces varying costs of compensation and (re-)negotiation for governments. I argue that an adaptation-cost-based account of member states’ reform capacities allows us to obtain a better understanding of the pace and timing of electricity sector liberalisation in the EU as well as processes of Europeanisation more generally. The research question will be addressed through the lens of the rational-choice variant of Börzel & Risse’s goodness-of-fit framework which is complemented by the historical institutionalist notion of path dependencies.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Introduction
- I. Unbundling as Key Ingredient for the Internal Market of Electricity.
- Unbundling Options after the Third Electricity Directive
- II. Costs and Benefits of Ownership Unbundling..
- Theoretical Framework.
- The Goodness-of-Fit Hypothesis...
- Rational-Choice Institutionalism
- Path Dependence .....
- III. Research Design....
- Variables and Hypotheses: The Determinants of Unbundling Regime Choice........
- Methodology.
- IV. Quantitative Analysis.
- Decision-Theoretic Model
- V. Qualitative Analysis.
- Case Selection.
- Case Study Germany.
- Case Study Netherlands
- Conclusion.
- References......
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This master thesis examines the extent to which domestic constraints impact the implementation of European Union directives regarding the unbundling of national electricity systems. It aims to shed light on the complex interplay between European integration goals and national policy preferences, particularly focusing on the varying levels of unbundling adopted by member states.
- The impact of domestic political and economic factors on the implementation of European directives.
- The role of national governance structures and interest groups in shaping the pace and nature of electricity market liberalization.
- The challenges of achieving a truly competitive internal market in electricity due to national-level constraints.
- The impact of ownership structures of vertically integrated utilities (VIUs) on market competition.
- The effectiveness of different unbundling models in promoting competition and fostering a level playing field in the electricity sector.
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
The thesis begins with a thorough introduction to the concept of unbundling in the context of the European electricity market. It explores the historical development of the market and the rationale behind the unbundling approach. Chapter I delves deeper into the different unbundling options available to member states under the Third Electricity Directive, highlighting the key differences between 'hard' and 'soft' unbundling regimes. Chapter II lays out the theoretical framework underpinning the research, drawing on various theories such as rational-choice institutionalism and path dependence to explain the factors influencing the choice of unbundling model. It also examines the costs and benefits associated with unbundling. Chapter III outlines the research design, specifying the variables and hypotheses used to analyze the determinants of unbundling regime choice. It details the mixed-method approach employed, encompassing both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Chapter IV presents the quantitative analysis, focusing on the decision-theoretic model developed to explain the choice of unbundling regime. Chapter V delves into the qualitative analysis, presenting case studies of Germany and the Netherlands to gain a deeper understanding of the specific factors influencing unbundling decisions in practice. The conclusion summarizes the findings and their implications, highlighting the significance of domestic constraints in shaping the implementation of European integration goals in the electricity sector.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
The main keywords of the thesis include: Europeanization, electricity market liberalization, unbundling, vertically integrated utilities, domestic constraints, national governance, interest groups, rational-choice institutionalism, path dependence, benefit-cost analysis, decision-theoretic model, case studies, Germany, Netherlands. The thesis focuses on the interplay between European integration goals and national policy preferences, exploring the factors that shape the implementation of EU directives in the electricity sector, particularly the unbundling of ownership structures.
- Citation du texte
- Nico Miguel (Auteur), 2020, The Limits of Europeanisation. Domestic Constraints on Ownership Unbundling of National Electricity Systems, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/908564
