Grin logo
de en es fr
Boutique
GRIN Website
Publier des textes, profitez du service complet
Aller à la page d’accueil de la boutique › Pédagogie - Pédagogie pour écoles

Relative Standing, Absolute Consequences. A Critical Examination of the Stanine Grading System in Ghana's Basic Education Certificate Examination

A Practitioner-Researcher Analysis of the 2026 Grading Controversy

Titre: Relative Standing, Absolute Consequences. A Critical Examination of the Stanine Grading System in Ghana's Basic Education Certificate Examination

Travail de Recherche , 2026 , 8 Pages

Autor:in: Ernest Offei (Auteur)

Pédagogie - Pédagogie pour écoles
Extrait & Résumé des informations   Lire l'ebook
Résumé Résumé des informations

Background: The release of the 2026 Basic Education Certificate Examination (BECE) provisional results in Ghana reignited long-standing controversy over the Stanine (Standard Nine) grading system, following allegations by private-school associations that candidates had been unfairly graded.

Purpose: This study examines the historical origins, psychometric logic, and contemporary contestation of the Stanine system, situating the 2026 dispute within the broader theoretical distinction between norm-referenced and criterion-referenced assessment.

Methodology: A qualitative, document-based analytical approach was adopted, drawing on West African Examinations Council (WAEC) public statements, the 1999–2000 Ghana Education Service (GES) Grading System Committee report, peer-reviewed assessment literature, and contemporaneous investigative and news reporting on the 2026 controversy.

Findings: The Stanine system, in continuous use since the BECE's inception in 1990, is a norm-referenced instrument whose grade bands are fixed proportions of each year's candidate cohort rather than fixed absolute-achievement thresholds. This architecture necessarily produces relative winners and losers independent of absolute mastery, a structural feature identified as problematic by GES's own reviewers as early as 2000 and sharpened by the 2019 shift to a criterion-oriented Standards-Based Curriculum. The 2026 dispute conflates two analytically distinct grievances: individually verifiable administrative errors, and a systemic objection to norm-referencing itself.

Conclusion: The persistence of unresolved grievance around Stanine grading reflects an unaddressed policy mismatch between assessment philosophy and curriculum philosophy rather than a single administrative failure, and warrants formal policy review rather than incremental audit alone.

Résumé des informations

Titre
Relative Standing, Absolute Consequences. A Critical Examination of the Stanine Grading System in Ghana's Basic Education Certificate Examination
Sous-titre
A Practitioner-Researcher Analysis of the 2026 Grading Controversy
Auteur
Ernest Offei (Auteur)
Année de publication
2026
Pages
8
N° de catalogue
V1772826
ISBN (PDF)
9783389207628
Langue
anglais
mots-clé
relative standing absolute consequences critical examination stanine grading system ghana basic education certificate practitioner-researcher analysis controversy
Sécurité des produits
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Citation du texte
Ernest Offei (Auteur), 2026, Relative Standing, Absolute Consequences. A Critical Examination of the Stanine Grading System in Ghana's Basic Education Certificate Examination, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1772826
Lire l'ebook
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
Extrait de  8  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Expédition
  • Contact
  • Prot. des données
  • CGV
  • Imprint
  • Révoquer le contrat