This paper sets out to examine how and why a country take decisions on international issues without recourse to consulting or liaising with other countries either in the execution of war or in the course of embarkation on peacemaking. Focus shall be on some wars and peace-making efforts solely planned and implemented without recourse to set international rules and respect for the protection of human rights and how it affects international relations. What are the impacts of such unilateral decisions? Some of these actions were adjudged either wrong or right especially when unilateralism was precipitated by the lack of consensus to reach negotiations or how unilateralism negatively affects other countries. From whatever position these actions are evaluated, it is a growing anomaly that could manifest dire consequences. What are the statistics of unilateralism in modern times?
This thesis shall also examine how the international community responds to unilateralism in conflict resolution. How effective has the reactions of the United Nations towards unilateralism been to date? What are the causes, motivation and consequences of unilateralism? Unilateralism in itself does not determine the legitimacy or illegitimacy of an action. It is the circumstances of the action and the responses of other states that usually determine the legitimacy of unilateralism; especially if the action affects a third state. This thesis shall examine the effects of multilateral responses against unilateralism and how such responses have guarded the norms of international relations and human rights. When does multilateral inaction instigate unilateralism for global benefit? Why do majority of countries remain silent when a country wrongly embark on a unilateral action to attack or annex another country?
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Chapter 1: Background
- 1.1 Abstract
- 1.2 Justification
- 1.3 Methodology
- 1.4 Literature review
- Chapter 2: Nature of conflicts
- 2.1 Conflicts from Natural Resources
- 2.2 Energy as a global driver
- 2.2.1 South China Sea
- 2.2.2 Sudan and South Sudan
- 2.2.3 Egypt and Israel
- 2.2.4 Argentina seizes YPF
- 2.2.5 Argentina, Britain and the Falklands
- 2.2.6 Iran and Uranium
- Chapter 3: Conflicts Resolution
- 3.1 Niger Delta Militants
- 3.2 Boko haram
- 3.3 Biafra
- 3.4 Other Conflicts and their resolutions
- 3.4.1 Egypt: Suez Canal
- 3.4.2 Rwanda Civil War: 1990-94
- 3.4.3 South Africa
- 3.4.4 Libya
- 3.4.5 Kingdom of Laos
- 3.4.6 Cambodia
- 3.4.7 Iraq
- 3.4.8 Expulsion of Palestinians in Kuwait
- 3.4.9 The Ossetia Conflict 1991-1992
- 3.4.10 Jammu and Kashmir
- 3.4.11 Failure of the UN in Sri Lanka
- 3.4.12 United Nations Peace Keeping facts sheet
- Chapter 4: Why Conflicts remain unresolved
- Chapter 5: Unilateralism in Conflict Resolution
- 5.1 The US/NATO War in former Yugoslavia
- 5.2 Impacts and Challenges in Human rights
- 5.3 Challenges in International Relations
- 5.4 Unilateralism in the invasion of Kuwait
- 5.5 Impacts of the invasion of Kuwait
- 5.5.1 Challenges in Human rights
- 5.5.2 Challenges in International Relations
- Chapter 6: Multilateralism and Unilateralism
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This thesis examines the causes, consequences, and international responses to unilateralism in conflict resolution. It analyzes instances where nations have taken action without consulting other countries, focusing on the impacts on international relations and human rights. The study investigates the effectiveness of multilateral responses and explores the conditions under which unilateral action might be considered legitimate.
- The nature and causes of unilateralism in international conflict resolution.
- The impact of unilateral actions on international relations.
- The role of human rights in justifying or condemning unilateral actions.
- The effectiveness of multilateral responses to unilateralism.
- The circumstances under which unilateral action might be considered justifiable.
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
Chapter 1: Background: This chapter introduces the prevalence of warfare and the challenges of multilateral responses, which are sometimes slow and ineffective. It uses the 2003 Iraq War as a prime example of unilateral action, highlighting the differing perspectives of the coalition forces and the United Nations regarding the legality of the intervention. The chapter then sets the stage for the thesis by posing questions about the legitimacy of unilateralism and its impact on international law and human rights. It also lays out the thesis's central research questions, examining the reasons behind unilateral decisions, the international community's responses, and the effectiveness of those responses in upholding international norms and human rights.
Chapter 2: Nature of conflicts: This chapter explores the root causes of conflicts, focusing on the role of natural resources, particularly energy, as a significant driver of conflict. It provides several case studies illustrating this point, ranging from disputes in the South China Sea to conflicts over oil in Sudan and other regions. Each case study serves to illustrate the complex interplay of political, economic, and strategic factors contributing to conflict, offering a wide-ranging geographical and thematic scope for understanding conflict's causes.
Chapter 3: Conflicts Resolution: This chapter examines various examples of conflict resolution, both successful and unsuccessful. It covers diverse cases such as the Niger Delta militants, Boko Haram, and the Biafran conflict, contrasting them with other instances like the resolution of the Suez Canal crisis and the end of the Rwandan civil war. The chapter likely analyzes the different strategies employed, highlighting the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of various approaches and the specific contexts in which these resolutions occurred.
Chapter 4: Why Conflicts remain unresolved: This chapter analyzes the reasons behind the persistence of conflicts, delving into the underlying structural, political, and societal factors that hinder effective conflict resolution. It probably explores issues such as power imbalances, lack of political will, the role of external actors, and the influence of historical grievances in perpetuating conflict. The chapter likely draws upon the case studies detailed in previous chapters to illustrate these hindering factors.
Chapter 5: Unilateralism in Conflict Resolution: This chapter delves into the specific instances of unilateral action in conflict resolution, using the US/NATO intervention in former Yugoslavia and the invasion of Kuwait as pivotal case studies. The analysis likely explores the rationale behind these actions, their impacts on international relations and human rights, and the criticisms they elicited from the international community. The consequences, both intended and unintended, of these unilateral actions are analyzed in detail.
Chapter 6: Multilateralism and Unilateralism: This chapter offers a comparative analysis of multilateral and unilateral approaches to conflict resolution. It examines the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, analyzing their effectiveness in various contexts. The chapter probably contrasts instances where multilateralism proved successful with cases where unilateralism seemed more effective (or less damaging). It likely highlights the advantages of cooperation versus the risks of unilateral action in achieving durable peace.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
Unilateralism, conflict resolution, international relations, human rights, multilateralism, international law, war, peace, diplomacy, sanctions, intervention, Iraq War, Kuwait invasion, case studies, legitimacy, effectiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions: A Comprehensive Language Preview on Unilateralism in Conflict Resolution
What is the main topic of this thesis?
This thesis examines the causes, consequences, and international responses to unilateralism in conflict resolution. It analyzes instances where nations have taken action without consulting other countries, focusing on the impacts on international relations and human rights. The study investigates the effectiveness of multilateral responses and explores the conditions under which unilateral action might be considered legitimate.
What are the key themes explored in the thesis?
Key themes include the nature and causes of unilateralism in international conflict resolution; the impact of unilateral actions on international relations; the role of human rights in justifying or condemning unilateral actions; the effectiveness of multilateral responses to unilateralism; and the circumstances under which unilateral action might be considered justifiable.
What topics are covered in each chapter?
Chapter 1 (Background): Introduces the prevalence of warfare and challenges of multilateral responses, using the 2003 Iraq War as an example. It sets the stage by posing questions about the legitimacy of unilateralism and its impact. Chapter 2 (Nature of Conflicts): Explores the root causes of conflicts, focusing on natural resources, especially energy, with case studies from the South China Sea to Sudan. Chapter 3 (Conflict Resolution): Examines various conflict resolutions, both successful and unsuccessful, including the Niger Delta, Boko Haram, Biafra, the Suez Canal crisis, and the Rwandan civil war. Chapter 4 (Why Conflicts Remain Unresolved): Analyzes reasons for persistent conflicts, focusing on structural, political, and societal factors hindering resolution. Chapter 5 (Unilateralism in Conflict Resolution): Delves into specific instances of unilateral action, such as the US/NATO intervention in former Yugoslavia and the invasion of Kuwait, analyzing their impacts. Chapter 6 (Multilateralism and Unilateralism): Offers a comparative analysis of multilateral and unilateral approaches, examining their strengths and weaknesses in various contexts.
What are some specific case studies used in the thesis?
Case studies include the South China Sea disputes, conflicts in Sudan and South Sudan, the Suez Canal crisis, the Rwandan Civil War, the US/NATO intervention in former Yugoslavia, the invasion of Kuwait, and the Iraq War. The thesis also examines conflicts in Argentina, Britain (Falklands), Iran, Niger Delta, Boko Haram, Biafra, South Africa, Libya, Laos, Cambodia, Jammu and Kashmir, and Sri Lanka, amongst others.
What are the keywords associated with this thesis?
Keywords include unilateralism, conflict resolution, international relations, human rights, multilateralism, international law, war, peace, diplomacy, sanctions, intervention, Iraq War, Kuwait invasion, case studies, legitimacy, and effectiveness.
What is the overall objective of this research?
The overall objective is to analyze unilateralism in conflict resolution, assess its impact on international relations and human rights, and evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches to conflict resolution, ultimately exploring the conditions under which unilateral action might be considered legitimate.
Who is the intended audience for this work?
The intended audience is primarily academic, focusing on researchers and students interested in international relations, conflict studies, and human rights. The structured format and professional tone suggest a scholarly approach to the subject matter.
Where can I find more information on this research?
The provided information is a comprehensive preview. For complete details, consult the full thesis document itself (not included here).
- Citation du texte
- Frederick Omoyoma Odorige (Auteur), 2017, Unilateralism in Conflict Resolution. Its Challenges in International Relations and Human Rights, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/379026
